2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNA signatures discriminate between uterine and ovarian serous carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate the overlap in IHC expression between serous carcinomas arising at the 2 primary sites such that it is insufficiently discriminatory to allow accurate diagnosis of primary site in an individual case. Differences in gene expression profiling and microRNA signatures have been put forward as potential discriminatory tools to separate tubo-ovarian HGSC from ESC but are not clinically applicable at this time 47,48 …”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results demonstrate the overlap in IHC expression between serous carcinomas arising at the 2 primary sites such that it is insufficiently discriminatory to allow accurate diagnosis of primary site in an individual case. Differences in gene expression profiling and microRNA signatures have been put forward as potential discriminatory tools to separate tubo-ovarian HGSC from ESC but are not clinically applicable at this time 47,48 …”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in gene expression profiling and microRNA signatures have been put forward as potential discriminatory tools to separate tubo-ovarian HGSC from ESC but are not clinically applicable at this time. 47,48 In summary there are currently no robust clinical, morphological, or biomarker features that separate HGSC of endometrial from that of tubo-ovarian origin in instances where both the endometrium and fallopian tube epithelium are involved by disease. Specifically, intraepithelial carcinoma at either location can represent the primary lesion or secondary involvement, the presence of a dominant mass favors but is not sufficiently specific to determine one primary site over the other, and no biomarker has been proven to have sufficient specificity to enable accurate distinction between possible primary sites.…”
Section: High-grade Serous Carcinoma With Concurrent Involvement Of T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the strong evidence on the oncogenic function of miR-196 in cancers, few reports have indicated that the miR-196 family can act as tumor suppressors in some cancers, such as melanoma and breast cancer (26). Some studies have suggested miR-196a as a noninvasive biomarker for diagnosis, staging and prognosis of cancers (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Correlation Analysis Of the Mir-196a With Clinicopathologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MiR-92a, miR-106a and miR-200b were upregulated in endometrial cancer cells compared to ovarian, and conversely miR-222 was upregulated in ovarian cancer cells compared to endometrial cancer cells [ 75 ]. Hui et al illustrated that miRNA signatures successfully differentiated uterine serous carcinomas from ovarian serous carcinomas [ 76 ]. Notwithstanding, if serous carcinoma is diagnosed at an advanced stage, distinction between primary and metastatic tumours often proves challenging [ 76 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hui et al illustrated that miRNA signatures successfully differentiated uterine serous carcinomas from ovarian serous carcinomas [ 76 ]. Notwithstanding, if serous carcinoma is diagnosed at an advanced stage, distinction between primary and metastatic tumours often proves challenging [ 76 ]. Such factors have clinically significant implications as they effect decision-making in terms of treatment regimens for the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%