2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-018-0922-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNA transcriptome analysis of porcine vital organ responses to immunosuppressive porcine cytomegalovirus infection

Abstract: BackgroundPorcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) is an immunosuppressive virus that mainly inhibits T-lymphocyte and macrophage immune functions; it has significantly damaged the farming industry. Although recent studies have shown that miRNAs play important roles in immune responses, the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs during immunosuppressive virus infection remain unclear.MethodsIn this study, porcine small-RNA transcriptomes of PCMV-infected and uninfected vital organs were first characterised by high-throughput s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), indicating that gE and gI genes affect PRV-to-host infection by interfering with miRNA expression. This is in agreement with previous work showing that a series of miR-NAs are significantly DE in different viral-infected cell lines or tissues [26,[30][31][32], indicating that these miRNAs play similar regulatory roles during viral infection (Table S5). The host-encoded miR-182 was significantly upregulated in PRV Fa ΔgE/gI strain-infected PK-15 cells, while miR-182 inhibits virus replication through activation of type I IFN response by targeting FOXO3 in neural cells [33], this suggested that upregulation of miR-182 after gE/gI deletion may inhibit PRV replication in the host.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4), indicating that gE and gI genes affect PRV-to-host infection by interfering with miRNA expression. This is in agreement with previous work showing that a series of miR-NAs are significantly DE in different viral-infected cell lines or tissues [26,[30][31][32], indicating that these miRNAs play similar regulatory roles during viral infection (Table S5). The host-encoded miR-182 was significantly upregulated in PRV Fa ΔgE/gI strain-infected PK-15 cells, while miR-182 inhibits virus replication through activation of type I IFN response by targeting FOXO3 in neural cells [33], this suggested that upregulation of miR-182 after gE/gI deletion may inhibit PRV replication in the host.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present study also showed that 46.8% and 43.9% miRNAs were significantly DE in PRV Fa wild-type strain-infected and PRV Fa ΔgE/gI strain-infected PK-15 cells compared with non-infected PK-15 cells, respectively, suggesting that PRV invasion significantly affected host miRNA expression. Sequencing results showed that ssc-miR-21, ssc-miR-10b, ssc-miR-10a-5p, ssc-let-7a, ssc-let-7f, and ssc-miR-30a-5p miRNAs had the highest expression in each cell sample (Table S1), which agrees with previous findings in various mammals, suggesting that these miRNAs are conserved under PRV infection [25,26]. Among these miRNAs, hostencoded ssc-miR-10a-5p can reduce PRRSV replication by inhibiting the expression of the host-encoded signal recognition particle 14 gene, while miR-10a was reported to inhibit the activation of T helper (Th)1/Th7 cells by targeting interleukin (IL)-12/ IL-23p40 [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The rst nucleotide bias of known 20 nt, 22 nt, 24 nt miRNAs is U which was similar to others [12]. While, the rst nucleotide bias of known 21nt and 23nt miRNA and novel miRNA was different from other researches [7,8]. The length of predicted novel miRNA was largely aggregated in 22 nt, while the length of known miRNA was mainly clustered in 23 nt which was different from other reports [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…MicroRNAs (miRNA) are a kind of 22~nt small non-coding RNAs that direct posttranscriptional repression of mRNA targets in mammals [6]. In recent years, a large number of miRNAs have been identi ed in eukaryotic organisms from nematodes to humans [7][8][9]. Moreover, miRNAs have been regarded as key regulators because they play a critical role in various biological processes, such as animal development, cell proliferation, and differentiation, transcriptional regulation, and homeostasis [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When porcine micro-RNAs (miRNA) were analyzed in PCMV/PRV-infected and non-infected porcine macrophages, the differentially expressed miRNAs are mainly involved in immune and metabolic processes [176]. Ninety-two, 107, 95, 77, and 111 miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed in lung, liver, spleen, kidney, and thymus after PCMV/PRV infection, providing insights into the regulatory mechanisms of miRNAs during infection by immunosuppressive viruses [179].…”
Section: Pathogenicitymentioning
confidence: 99%