2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2022.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for (cancer–associated) venous thromboembolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its potential aim is mRNA in genes VEGF and eNOS. Unfortunately most of the studies used only small sample sizes and lacked external validation (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its potential aim is mRNA in genes VEGF and eNOS. Unfortunately most of the studies used only small sample sizes and lacked external validation (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents the relevant studies presenting modalities and importance of VTE screening among ambulatory cancer patients. microRNAs (miRNAs) represent a promising class of biomarkers in VTE prediction in cancer, but until now, only a few small-sample-size studies, lacking external validation, have investigated their role in this setting [29]. The long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may have a role as well in VTE pathogenesis [30].…”
Section: Vte Screening In Ambulatory High-risk Oncologic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the several factors contributing to this disappointing behavior, the absence of valuable clinical tools able to evaluate the specific and individualized risk of venous thromboembolism may play a major role. Accordingly, the authors of the recently published European Society of Medical Oncology Guidelines [17] strongly endorsed the development of cancer-specific risk assessment models to further refine current risk stratification approaches or to develop new models that incorporate promising biomarkers [22][23][24], given that thrombogenic potential varies depending on the type of cancer, the setting of disease, or the presence of certain oncogene mutations/rearrangements [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%