2024
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0276-23.2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsaccades Track Location-Based Object Rehearsal in Visual Working Memory

Eelke de Vries,
Freek van Ede

Abstract: Besides controlling eye movements, the brain's oculomotor system has been implicated in the control of covert spatial attention and the rehearsal of spatial information in working memory. We investigated whether the oculomotor system also contributes to rehearsing visual objects in working memory when object location is never asked about. To address this, we tracked the incidental use of locations for mnemonic rehearsal via directional biases in microsaccades while participants maintained two visual objects (c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case, one may have expected to exclusively find a future-directed gaze bias, unlike what we observed. Moreover, using a complementary analysis of saccade directions along the axis of the future rule ( de Vries and van Ede, 2024 ), we found no direct evidence for remapping in the period between encoding and cue ( Figure 2—figure supplement 1 ). Second, when dealing with multiple memory contents, contents could be stored at the past location at first and the future location could be considered only after relevant memory content has been selected (in which case the past bias should have preceded the future bias).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this case, one may have expected to exclusively find a future-directed gaze bias, unlike what we observed. Moreover, using a complementary analysis of saccade directions along the axis of the future rule ( de Vries and van Ede, 2024 ), we found no direct evidence for remapping in the period between encoding and cue ( Figure 2—figure supplement 1 ). Second, when dealing with multiple memory contents, contents could be stored at the past location at first and the future location could be considered only after relevant memory content has been selected (in which case the past bias should have preceded the future bias).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our finding of joint utilisation of past and future memory attributes emerged from at least two alternative scenarios of how the brain may deal with dynamic everyday working memory demands in which memory content is encoded at one location but needed at another. First, memory contents could have directly been remapped ( Brincat et al, 2021 ; de Vries and van Ede, 2024 ; Hayhoe and Ballard, 2005 ; Pelz and Canosa, 2001 ) to their future-relevant location. However, in this case, one may have expected to exclusively find a future-directed gaze bias, unlike what we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were instructed to keep their gaze fixated on the cross in the center of the screen during task performance. Even so, fixational eye movements are difficult to suppress (especially for individuals not used to psychophysical testing), and previous work has lined fixational eye movements to working memory performance ( Van Ede et al, 2019 ; Willeke et al, 2019 ; Linde-Domingo and Spitzer, 2023 ; De Vries and Van Ede, 2024 ). Furthermore, even small fixational eye movements may affect E/MEG data ( Yuval-Greenberg et al, 2008 ; Liu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms by which microsaccades reflect shifts in internal attention are at the forefront of contemporary cognitive research, with significant advancements noted in recent literature ( Griffin and Nobre, 2003 ; Souza and Oberauer, 2016 ; van Ede and Nobre, 2023 ). This reflection is potentially attributable to the involuntary encoding of location information with memory representations (e.g., Treisman and Zhang, 2006 ; Gu et al, 2020 ), coupled with an active rehearsal of memory representations based on their relative positions in the focus of attention ( de Vries and van Ede, 2024 ). One intriguing aspect for future examination is the dependency of microsaccade directionality on the spatial arrangement of information at the time of memory encoding, the relative positions among memory representation, as well as the interaction between the two factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%