2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-005-7765-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite DNA Analysis of Wild Hops, Humulus lupulus L.

Abstract: To study the relationships and genetic diversity among wild hops, Humulus lupulus, we analyzed 133 samples of wild hops collected from Europe, Asia and North America using polymorphism on 11 microsatellite loci. Although only three primers showed bands in Japanese hops, all other samples showed polymorphic bands at most loci. There were no duplicate genotypes among samples of European, Chinese and North American hops, and each individual hop could be distinguished completely. The phylogenetic tree constructed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A phylogenetic tree based on microsatellite DNA also showed the Caucasus hops to be deeply divergent from a large cluster of European hops (Murakami et al, 2006). This differentiation could have arisen if the Caucasus region was genetically isolated from other European populations, perhaps as one of the refugia located in southern Europe area during glacial periods.…”
Section: European Hopsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A phylogenetic tree based on microsatellite DNA also showed the Caucasus hops to be deeply divergent from a large cluster of European hops (Murakami et al, 2006). This differentiation could have arisen if the Caucasus region was genetically isolated from other European populations, perhaps as one of the refugia located in southern Europe area during glacial periods.…”
Section: European Hopsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One model of founder speciation involves severe but short-term founder events that reduce microsatellite allele variation by loss of rare alleles without substantially reducing heterozygosity, the test for heterozygosity excess could detect such kind of founder events (Cournuet and Luikart, 1996). A recent microsatellite DNA study of 11 loci (Murakami et al, 2006) analysed wild hops, in almost the same samples used in this study. It found highly polymorphic microsatellites, but no significant excess heterozygosity (P40.05) in European wild hops, thus providing no evidence of recent founder events of this type.…”
Section: European Hopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardně se však využívají přímo v reakcích jednoduchých sekvenčních repetic (SSR). Proto byly a jsou SSR markery nejpoužívanější pro genotypování a studium molekulární variability u chmele (Jakše et al, 2001;2002;Čerenak et al, 2004;Hadonou et al, 2004;Murakami et al, 2006a;Bassil et al, 2008;Štajner et al, 2005;Peredo et al, 2010;Patzak et al, 2010a;Horreo et al, 2014;Karlsson Strese et al, 2014;Mongelli et al, 2015;Korbecka-Glinka et al, 2016). Většina SSR markerů se nachází v nekódujících oblastech genomu.…”
Section: ■ 3 Genetické Metodyunclassified
“…The SSR method has been the most reliable for molecular genetic analysis of variability and evaluation of biodiversity in different plant species (Akkak et al 2009, Akritidis et al 2009, Hu et al 2009, Ma et al 2010. Therefore, microsatellite SSR markers have also been the most used for studies of molecular variability of hops (Jakše et al 2001, Čerenak et al 2004, Murakami et al 2006, Bassil et al 2008, Štajner et al 2008. The most of SSR markers occurs in noncoding regions of genome (Akkak et al 2009).…”
Section: ⎯⎯⎯⎯mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A genetic diversity is depend on range of hop collection, as it has been previously measured in various sets of accessions in cultivated hops (Jakše et al 2001, Patzak et al 2002, 2007, Čerenak et al 2004, wild hops (Murakami et al 2006, Patzak et al 2010a or a combination of wild and cultivated hops , Bassil et al 2008, Štajner et al 2008. All these studies separated hop cultivars into European and North American hop groups, with further divisions into smaller subgroups reflecting the breeding history of particular regions or breeding centres.…”
Section: Cultivated Hops With North American Origin Brewersmentioning
confidence: 99%