2000
DOI: 10.1007/s101260000012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite Polymorphism and the Population Structure of the Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
18
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic diversity of Aristeus antennatus populations was high both for the numbers of alleles (mean 13.5 alleles per locus) and for the heterozygosities: the mean observed heterozygosity over all loci was 0.65, less than the 0.80 mean value for the unbiased expected heterozygosity. These diversity parameters were in the range of those reported for other Penaeoidea species analyzed with microsatellites (Brooker et al 2000;Supungul et al 2000;Xu et al 2001;Maggioni et al 2003;Ward et al 2006;Borrell et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Robainas-Barcia et al 2008;You et al 2008;Meng et al 2009). The average heterozygosity levels of microsatellite data for A. antennatus were about 10 times higher than those obtained in previous studies with allozyme data; in fact, the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.077 to 0.095 in A. antennatus populations from Sardinia and Sicily (Marchi et al 1995) and even lower values were found in red and blue shrimps from several localities both in the Atlantic and Western Mediterranean, where He ranged from 0.043 to 0.066 (Sardà et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The genetic diversity of Aristeus antennatus populations was high both for the numbers of alleles (mean 13.5 alleles per locus) and for the heterozygosities: the mean observed heterozygosity over all loci was 0.65, less than the 0.80 mean value for the unbiased expected heterozygosity. These diversity parameters were in the range of those reported for other Penaeoidea species analyzed with microsatellites (Brooker et al 2000;Supungul et al 2000;Xu et al 2001;Maggioni et al 2003;Ward et al 2006;Borrell et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Robainas-Barcia et al 2008;You et al 2008;Meng et al 2009). The average heterozygosity levels of microsatellite data for A. antennatus were about 10 times higher than those obtained in previous studies with allozyme data; in fact, the expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.077 to 0.095 in A. antennatus populations from Sardinia and Sicily (Marchi et al 1995) and even lower values were found in red and blue shrimps from several localities both in the Atlantic and Western Mediterranean, where He ranged from 0.043 to 0.066 (Sardà et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Nevertheless, a significant genetic variation between populations of P. monodon from Indonesia and Australia was detected (Benzie et al., 1992; Sugama et al., 2002). However, inclusion of more variable nuclear markers such as mtDNA (Benzie et al., 1993), RAPD (Klinbunga et al., 1998, 1999; Tassanakajon et al., 1998a) or microsatellites (Supungul et al., 2000; Xu et al., 2001) presented contrasting results. Our study also revealed significant genetic differentiation in P. monodon in coastal Chinese waters, supported by the amova results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there are few studies about genetic structure of wild P. monodon in China, there have been extensive studies of genetic structure of wild P. monodom in Australia and SE Asia (Benzie et al., 1992, 1993; Klinbunga et al., 1998, 1999; Sugama et al., 2002). Alhough some analyses of genetic diversity using allozymes indicated a low level of genetic diversity (Mulley and Latter, 1980; Benzie et al., 1992, 1993; Sugama et al., 2002), the analysis of mitochondrial RFLP polymorphisms (Klinbunga et al., 1998, 1999; Benzie et al., 2002), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (Tassanakajon et al., 1997, 1998a) and microsatellites (Tassanakajon et al., 1998b; Brooker et al., 2000; Supungul et al., 2000; Xu et al., 2001) all found a greater level of genetic variation. Furthermore, these methods found significant population differentiation in P. monodon between Australia and SE Asia (Benzie et al., 1992, 2002; Klinbunga et al., 1998, 1999; Tassanakajon et al., 1998b; Brooker et al., 2000; Supungul et al., 2000; Xu et al., 2001; Sugama et al., 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its economic importance, however, there is very limited information on the evolution and colonization of P. Monodon in the Indo-Pacific region. Most genetic studies have been limited to P. monodon indigenous to regions including Australia (Mulley and Latter 1980;Benzie et al 1992Benzie et al , 1993Brooker et al 2000), Thailand (Tassanakajon et al 1997;Supungul et al 2000;Klinbunga et al 2001), India ), Indonesia , the Philippines (Xu et al 2001), and South Africa (Forbes et al 1999). A few studies have examined genetic diversity between major populations distributed more widely such as eastern Africa, Southeast Asia and Australia (Bouchon et al 1994;Duda and Palumbi 1999;Benzie et al 2002;You et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%