2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancers Stratified by the BRAF V600E Mutation Show Distinct Patterns of Chromosomal Instability

Abstract: The BRAF (V600E) mutation in colorectal cancers that are microsatellite stable (MSS) confers a poor patient prognosis, whereas BRAF mutant microsatellite-unstable (MSI) colorectal cancers have an excellent prognosis. BRAF wild type cancers are typically MSS and display chromosomal instability (CIN). CIN has not been extensively studied on a genome-wide basis in relation to BRAF mutational status in colorectal cancer. BRAF mutant/MSS (BRAFmut/MSS) cancers (n = 33) and BRAF mutant/MSI (BRAFmut/MSI) cancers (n = … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BRAF mutant/MSI cancers had a low rate of deletion (4/30, 13.3%), which was expected since MSI cancers are known to be diploid [22]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAF mutant/MSI cancers had a low rate of deletion (4/30, 13.3%), which was expected since MSI cancers are known to be diploid [22]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The somatic inactivation of MMR genes is strongly associated with V600E BRAF mutation (60%), which is virtually absent in Lynch syndrome [80,81]. Hence, somatic BRAF mutation testing has been included into the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm [76,[82][83][84][85][86]. The prognostic and predictive value of coexisting BRAF mutation and MSI is still matter of debate.…”
Section: Braf Mutations and Mmr Status In Crcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is believed that the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-1b, IL-2 and TNF-a regulate neurogenesis in an inversely proportional manner (Butovsky et al 2006, Whitney et al 2009 whereby their presence would downregulate the expression of transcription factors such as NEUROG, FLNA and MEF2C. It was further described that the inhibition of neurogenesis was initiated via a de-activation of the WNT pathway (Robel et al 2011, Lian et al 2012, Bond et al 2014). This pathway is well known for promoting the self-renewal of neural progenitors, a reduction in their stemness and a consequent differentiation in a stage-specific manner (Varela-Nallar & Inestrosa 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%