2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01255.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite variation and fine‐scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica)

Abstract: We investigated genetic population structure in wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) from a series of Prairie Pothole wetlands in the northern Great Plains. Amphibians are often thought to exist in demographic metapopulations, which require some movement between populations, yet genetic studies have revealed strong subdivision among populations, even at relatively fine scales (several km). Wood frogs are highly philopatric and studies of dispersal suggest that they may exhibit subdivision on a scale of approximately 1-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
128
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
12
128
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A full description of site selection for these ponds is available in Brady (2012, 2013). Across all ponds, pairwise distance ranged from 880 to 6,060 m. Estimates of neutral genetic neighborhood for the wood frog range from about 1,000 to 10,000 m (Berven & Grudzien, 1990; Newman & Squire, 2001), although evidence for local adaptation has been reported between populations separated by as few as 10s of meters (Skelly, 2004). Thus, the populations we report likely experience limited gene flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full description of site selection for these ponds is available in Brady (2012, 2013). Across all ponds, pairwise distance ranged from 880 to 6,060 m. Estimates of neutral genetic neighborhood for the wood frog range from about 1,000 to 10,000 m (Berven & Grudzien, 1990; Newman & Squire, 2001), although evidence for local adaptation has been reported between populations separated by as few as 10s of meters (Skelly, 2004). Thus, the populations we report likely experience limited gene flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few studies have investigated microsatellite variation in anurans, but those studies found relatively low levels of within-population diversity. Mean H E ranged from 0.088-0.77 in studies reviewed by Newman and Squire (2001). More recently, mean H E was calculated from microsatellite loci in Hyla arborea (0.52, Arens et al 2000), Rana lessonae (0.57, Garner et al 2000;Zeisset et al 2000), R. ridibunda (0.59.…”
Section: Genetic Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the population genetic structure of amphibians could help, at least in part, to understand the reason for such declines. Amphibian populations are often thought to have a metapopulation spatial structure (Alford and Richards, 1999), but few studies have actually assessed interpopulation movement, much less the effects of such movement on population dynamics and genetic structure (Newman and Squire, 2001). Amphibians are also thought to have low dispersal rates (Blaustein et al, 1994), although this may not apply to all species (Funk et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%