2006
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[579:mvodcp]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsatellite Variation of Double-Crested Cormorant Populations in Eastern North America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have reported the use of alternative flyways by different populations without characterizing the precise area of disjunction (Rubenstein et al 2002;McKay 2009). In addition to a quantitative assessment of migratory connectivity, application of our method to other birds and migratory animals may reveal (Waits et al 2003;Green et al 2006), the migratory divide evidenced here cannot be explained by past divergence in isolation and current populations retracing their historical expansion routes (Ruegg and Smith 2002). The hypothesis that it evolved to diminish travel cost or favor earlier arrival (Boulet and Norris 2006) also receives little support.…”
Section: Migratory Movementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors have reported the use of alternative flyways by different populations without characterizing the precise area of disjunction (Rubenstein et al 2002;McKay 2009). In addition to a quantitative assessment of migratory connectivity, application of our method to other birds and migratory animals may reveal (Waits et al 2003;Green et al 2006), the migratory divide evidenced here cannot be explained by past divergence in isolation and current populations retracing their historical expansion routes (Ruegg and Smith 2002). The hypothesis that it evolved to diminish travel cost or favor earlier arrival (Boulet and Norris 2006) also receives little support.…”
Section: Migratory Movementsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Migratory connectivity is the degree to which a specific breeding population can be linked to a specific wintering location. Unraveling the degree of migratory connectivity in the cormorant is important to develop efficient management strategies on a local and regional basis (Green et al 2006). There is also an ongoing debate whether cormorant populations should be managed on a flyway basis (Hebert et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular genetic analyses of the currently recognized subspecies of double‐crested cormorant have been conducted since previous regional or national status assessments were completed. Waits et al () and Green et al () restricted their analyses to the relationship of cormorants in the southeastern versus northeastern United States and found a lack of support for delineation below the species level between these regions. Mercer et al () analyzed samples of individuals from throughout North America and found little support for recognition of separate subspecies within the continental United States and Canada, outside of Alaska, indicating a lack of connectivity between the western population and Alaska.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After fledging, pelicans from northern breeding colonies migrate south to wintering grounds in the southern USA and coastal Mexico (Strait & Sloan, 1975; Knopf & Evans, 2004). In double‐crested cormorant ( Phalacrocorax auritus Lesson, 1831) breeding colonies in central Florida, little genetic differentiation was found between resident birds and migratory populations from the Great Lakes and Atlantic coast that overwinter in central Florida (Green et al ., 2006). The results of the present study suggest that mixing of resident and migratory pelicans may be occurring in over‐wintering areas such as the Laguna Madre of Texas, thereby limiting any genetic differentiation between southern and northern colonies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%