2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscale prediction of deformation in an austenitic stainless steel under uniaxial loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another aspect is the instrument friction with the sheet material that impede the equal plastic deformation. Most of the authors are trying to explain this improper depletion in thickness and technological difficulties during plastic deformation with different surveys introduced by one direction cut (usually identical with the rolling direction (RD)) samples [3][4][5][6]. This approach does not fully explain the differences in the strain values in the other directions relative to the RD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect is the instrument friction with the sheet material that impede the equal plastic deformation. Most of the authors are trying to explain this improper depletion in thickness and technological difficulties during plastic deformation with different surveys introduced by one direction cut (usually identical with the rolling direction (RD)) samples [3][4][5][6]. This approach does not fully explain the differences in the strain values in the other directions relative to the RD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EBSD scan of 300 µm × 175 µm is obtained from the region, directly adjacent to the notch root, as indicated in the lower diagram in figure 2b. EBSD results are presented as inverse pole maps, based on the three Euler angles [38,39]. Through the use of an EBSD analysis, changes in block orientation due to deformation can be measured accurately, providing experimental validation of constitutive models at the microscale.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has previously been established [40] that a columnar representation of the material microstructure yields almost identical results to a fully equiaxed (3D) model [38,41] when loaded in-plane. As the EBSD scan provides surface measurements only, significantly greater effort is required to obtain a full 3D representation of the material microstructure, with little apparent improvement in model accuracy [38][39][40][41]. Twelve material parameters are used in the crystal plasticity model.…”
Section: Microscale Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using this technique absorption correction can be neglected and the possible variation of texture through the thickness of the sample can be integrated [4]. The comparison between the neutron diffraction measurements and the model predictions suggests that in most cases the finite model can predict the lattice strain evolution at the microscale and capture the general trends observed in the experiments [7]. The results associated with latent hardening effects at the microscale also indicate that in situ neutron diffraction measurements in conjunction with macroscopic uniaxial tensile data may be used to calibrate crystal plasticity models for the prediction of the inelastic material deformation response [8], for determining the retained austenite content of transformation induced plasticity (TRIP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%