2018
DOI: 10.24916/iansa.2018.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic Analysis of Starch Grains and its Applications in the Archaeology of the Stone Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starch microremains are a suitable source of information about plant usage that can be detected directly from artefacts. This method can help refine the results from other kinds of analysis such as pollen, macroremains and phytolith analysis (Pearsal, 2015;Kovárník, Beneš, 2018). The observed data can supplement the information from some other area of knowledge.…”
Section: Habitatmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Starch microremains are a suitable source of information about plant usage that can be detected directly from artefacts. This method can help refine the results from other kinds of analysis such as pollen, macroremains and phytolith analysis (Pearsal, 2015;Kovárník, Beneš, 2018). The observed data can supplement the information from some other area of knowledge.…”
Section: Habitatmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Starch-grain analysis studies have found organic residue preserved on stone tools (Harris, 2013;Piperno et al, 2004;Pryor et al, 2013) and in dental calculus (Henry et al, 2011;Pryor et al, 2013). These grains are plant microremains such as spores, pollen and phytoliths (Kovárník & Beneš, 2018). Starch grains are particularly significant because they can be found in all plants and are resistant to grinding and drying, can occasionally survive carbonisation (Cortella & Pochettino, 1994) and can thus provide a list of species used at an archaeological site (Messner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Biological Indicators Of Plant Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Bilancino (Italy) and Dolní Věstonice (Czech Republic) supported evidence of advanced plant exploitation before the agricultural transition in Europe. In relation to the Mesolithic, starch-grain analysis made it possible to identify consumption of domestic cereals (Triticum monococcum, Triticum dicoccum, Hordeum distichon) before 8,550 BP in the Balkans (site of Vlasac) (Kovárník & Beneš, 2018).…”
Section: Biological Indicators Of Plant Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starch grain research has been carried out throughout the world on different kinds of archaeological material, such as stone tools, residues on potsherds, dental calculus and the soil matrix. It has proved to be useful in answering questions about the ancient use of starchy food, as well as contributing to various insights on cultivation, domestication and past human diet (Loy 1994;Torrence and Barton 2006;Copeland and Hardy 2018;Kovárník and Benes 2018;among others). In recent years, particular emphasis has been placed on the need for this kind of study to give detailed descriptions of, firstly, the processes leading to formation of the archaeological context under study, as well as post-depositional processes that may have occurred and affected the starch deposits; secondly, actions undertaken to prevent contamination of archaeological samples with modern starch; and thirdly, the care that must be taken to consider all these factors when taxonomic identification is proposed (Mercader et al 2017(Mercader et al , 2018Copeland and Hardy 2018).…”
Section: Microbotanical Analysis Starch Grains and Potsherdsmentioning
confidence: 99%