1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(90)90152-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic characterization of impurities in insulators through EPR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the displacement direction in this paper is opposite to that on the basis of the simple SPM of ZFS. In fact, Newman, one of the introducers of SPM of ZFS, and Ng [7] and Moreno [22] pointed out that the use of SPM in the analysis of ZFSs b2 for 3d5 ions has been a subject of continuing controversy. Jain and Singh [23] and Zheng [24] found that in the case of ligands with the distinct environments, the simple SPM is unable to explain the ZFS bZ and so they suggested that the different intrinsic parameters ó 2 (R0) for the same ligands with distinct environments should be employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the displacement direction in this paper is opposite to that on the basis of the simple SPM of ZFS. In fact, Newman, one of the introducers of SPM of ZFS, and Ng [7] and Moreno [22] pointed out that the use of SPM in the analysis of ZFSs b2 for 3d5 ions has been a subject of continuing controversy. Jain and Singh [23] and Zheng [24] found that in the case of ligands with the distinct environments, the simple SPM is unable to explain the ZFS bZ and so they suggested that the different intrinsic parameters ó 2 (R0) for the same ligands with distinct environments should be employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cubic field parameter Dq G R Àn . The pressure experiment for NiO [11] and the theoretical studies based on molecular orbital calculations for d m ions in many crystals [12,13] show that n % 5, the value obtained from the point-charge model, is approximately valid. So, we use the point-charge model here.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since the point-charge model with the expectation values r n of free d n ions can not reproduce the experimental crystal-field parameters, e. g., the cubic field parameter Dq [30,31], we calculate the tetragonal field parameters D s and D t from the empirical superposition model [32]. According to the model, we have…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%