1984
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(84)90346-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic description of nuclear collective states by symmetry conserving mean field theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there have been intense efforts in recent years ( Otsuka, 1984, Barrett, 1984, Pittel, 1984, Moszkowski, 1984, Yang et. aI., 1984, Arima, 1984, P. Ring, 1984, Wu and Feng,1984, Xu, 1984 to provide a better way of mapping a fermion system to a boson system so that a microscopic understanding of the IBM may emerge, such efforts have so far not bear fruit in the understanding of the origins of these dynamical symmetries. In our view, the dynamical symmetries unraveled by the IBM constitute the fundamental behavior of nuclei and therefore should, and must, manifest themselves directly from the fermion degrees of freedom without introducing bosons.Therefore it seems to us that the question one needs to ask at this point is: Suppose one begins with the same input physics as the IBM, namely nucleons in the valence shells tend to couple to the coherent S (1=0) and D (1=2) pairs, can one still find the dynamical symmetries which seem to manifest in the IBM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been intense efforts in recent years ( Otsuka, 1984, Barrett, 1984, Pittel, 1984, Moszkowski, 1984, Yang et. aI., 1984, Arima, 1984, P. Ring, 1984, Wu and Feng,1984, Xu, 1984 to provide a better way of mapping a fermion system to a boson system so that a microscopic understanding of the IBM may emerge, such efforts have so far not bear fruit in the understanding of the origins of these dynamical symmetries. In our view, the dynamical symmetries unraveled by the IBM constitute the fundamental behavior of nuclei and therefore should, and must, manifest themselves directly from the fermion degrees of freedom without introducing bosons.Therefore it seems to us that the question one needs to ask at this point is: Suppose one begins with the same input physics as the IBM, namely nucleons in the valence shells tend to couple to the coherent S (1=0) and D (1=2) pairs, can one still find the dynamical symmetries which seem to manifest in the IBM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%