1983
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(83)90137-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic disease at second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This will reveal a 55% rate of residual disease and a 45% negative findings after the pathological evaluations [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. We found a 52.7% rate of negative SLL and this was in accordance with some previous reports [8,12,16,17,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This will reveal a 55% rate of residual disease and a 45% negative findings after the pathological evaluations [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. We found a 52.7% rate of negative SLL and this was in accordance with some previous reports [8,12,16,17,26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Second look laparatomy (SLL) is a question of matter for these subset of patients since it will reveal 33-70% (mean 50%) residual disease in these patients. Of these patients; about 34% will have gross residual disease and so may be the subject of a secondary cytoreductive surgery during the procedure [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The remaining 45% of the patients with no pathologically proven disease (negative SLL) is the subject focused in this report.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results of this study show that patients with microscopic remnants at second look have a similar survival to that of patients who arc histopathologically free of disease. This finding is consistent with data reported by others [13][14][15] However, a shorter follow up and a difference in the duration of treatment (pa tients with PMiR received 5 additional cycles of therapy) could have accounted for the absence of a significant difference in survival in our series, mainly because groups were not comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…No salvage chemotherapy regimen has been shown to be effective in improving survival in this group of patients. However, several studies have shown that salvage or consolidation chemotherapy can confer a definite benefit in patients with microscopic disease detected during second-look procedures, with 5-year survival rates as high as 70% (35,36). Given that patients with falsenegative second-look procedures are likely to harbor microscopic disease, the prospects of identifying such patients, followed by administration of additional chemotherapy, may confer a better survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%