1979
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/5/3/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic models of the 21+and 31+states in24Mg and28Si and their test by inelastic scattering analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single-particle bound-state wave functions that complete the nuclear density matrices are harmonic oscillator (HO), Woods-Saxon (WS), or as given by the SHF studies [8,9]. For the inelastic scattering calculations, the no-core shell model was used to define the transition OBDME for the excitation of the 2 + 1 state in 12 C. For 2 + 1 transitions in the sd-shell nuclei, however, only projected Hartree-Fock (PHF) studies [10,11] have been made in a large enough basis to suit. There is an inconsistency in using SHF wave functions with PHF transition OBDME, but we can only await SHF studies giving excitation spectra and transition OBDME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-particle bound-state wave functions that complete the nuclear density matrices are harmonic oscillator (HO), Woods-Saxon (WS), or as given by the SHF studies [8,9]. For the inelastic scattering calculations, the no-core shell model was used to define the transition OBDME for the excitation of the 2 + 1 state in 12 C. For 2 + 1 transitions in the sd-shell nuclei, however, only projected Hartree-Fock (PHF) studies [10,11] have been made in a large enough basis to suit. There is an inconsistency in using SHF wave functions with PHF transition OBDME, but we can only await SHF studies giving excitation spectra and transition OBDME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%