2014
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/4/046601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic molecular superfluid response: theory and simulations

Abstract: Since its discovery in 1938, superfluidity has been the subject of much investigation because it provides a unique example of a macroscopic manifestation of quantum mechanics. About 60 years later, scientists successfully observed this phenomenon in the microscopic world though the spectroscopic Andronikashvili experiment in helium nano-droplets. This reduction of scale suggests that not only helium but also para-H2 (pH2) can be a candidate for superfluidity. This expectation is based on the fact that the smal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 341 publications
(601 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea is that the chirp-up physically corresponds to helium density gradually decoupling from the rotor as it speeds up to its terminal velocity; the superfluid fraction of the centrifugally stretched helium increases due to a decrease in the confining effects of the rotor, 84 and this superfluid fraction cannot couple to rotation. 85 Of particular interest is the angular inverse of β, which corresponds to the response time of the fluid (τ R ). The response time of the fluid with respect to the increase in rotational frequency from J = 0 to 1 is determined to be 1.4 ns, which is 0.5 ns slower than that in going from J = 1 to 2.…”
Section: Line Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that the chirp-up physically corresponds to helium density gradually decoupling from the rotor as it speeds up to its terminal velocity; the superfluid fraction of the centrifugally stretched helium increases due to a decrease in the confining effects of the rotor, 84 and this superfluid fraction cannot couple to rotation. 85 Of particular interest is the angular inverse of β, which corresponds to the response time of the fluid (τ R ). The response time of the fluid with respect to the increase in rotational frequency from J = 0 to 1 is determined to be 1.4 ns, which is 0.5 ns slower than that in going from J = 1 to 2.…”
Section: Line Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small para-hydrogen clusters are likely superfluid, 1 although no definite conclusion has been experimentally drawn yet. 2 Together with the frictionless displacement of impurities at velocities below the Landau critical velocity, 3 the appearance of quantized vortices is the recognized hallmark of superfluidity in liquid 4 He 4,5 that appear at temperatures below 2.17 K, the superfluid transition temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantum character of condensed pH 2 and oD 2 has led to the prediction of a variety of intriguing effects specific to the hydrogen liquids such as superfluidity of pH 2 [10], for which there is so far only indirect evidence coming from spectroscopic studies of small doped pH 2 clusters (see, e.g., Ref. [22], and references therein), or the realization of a structural quantum glass in a supercooled pH 2 -oD 2 mixture [12]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%