2022
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic pumping of viscous liquids with single cavitation bubbles

Abstract: A cavitation bubble expanding and collapsing near a rigid boundary develops a directed jet flow towards the boundary. In the case of a perforated plate, some of the jet flow passes through the plate and thus the bubble acts as a pump transporting liquid from one side of the plate to the opposite side. The transport is rather complex, is time dependent and varies with the geometric parameters of the bubble and the connecting channel. Therefore, we first model the transport of liquid through a perforated rigid p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peter et al simulated laserinduced microjets, neglecting viscosity and phase transition, and obtained the result that the microjet velocity was consistent with experimental results [10]. Reese et al simulated the dynamics of cavitation bubbles, neglecting the effects of phase change as in our study [35]. To close the system, a stiffened gas equation of state (SG EoS) was adopted.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Simulationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Peter et al simulated laserinduced microjets, neglecting viscosity and phase transition, and obtained the result that the microjet velocity was consistent with experimental results [10]. Reese et al simulated the dynamics of cavitation bubbles, neglecting the effects of phase change as in our study [35]. To close the system, a stiffened gas equation of state (SG EoS) was adopted.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Simulationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…2020), perforated plates (Gonzalez-Avila, Song & Ohl 2015; Reese et al. 2022) or spheres (Zhang et al. 2018; Li et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jet dynamics is frequently characterised by a stand-off parameter (Lindau & Lauterborn 2003;Supponen et al 2016;Lauterborn et al 2018) computed as the ratio of the distance between the bubble nucleation position and the boundary (d) and the maximum radius attained by the bubble after its creation (R max ). If the cavity collapse occurs next to boundaries other than a plane, for instance, irregular or curved surfaces (Tomita et al 2002;Blake, Leppinen & Wang 2015;Wu et al 2018a;Li et al 2019b;Aganin, Kosolapova & Malakhov 2022) like pillars (Kadivar et al 2021;Koch et al 2021b), fibres (Mur et al 2023), corners (Mahmud, Smith & Walmsley 2020;Zhang et al 2020), crevices (Andrews, Fernández Rivas & Peters 2020;Trummler et al 2020), perforated plates (Gonzalez-Avila, Song & Ohl 2015; Reese et al 2022) or spheres (Zhang et al 2018;Li et al 2019a;Zevnik & Dular 2020;Ren et al 2022), the anisotropy does not have one predominant direction and, thus, the use of a single stand-off parameter (e.g. d/R max ) is no longer sufficient to fully characterise the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambient pressure p ∞ = 101 325 Pa is applied at the exit of the gap. See Zeng et al (2018Zeng et al ( , 2020; Reese et al (2022) for further details on the numerical implementation.…”
Section: Experiments and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%