2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.212202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic structure factor of liquid parahydrogen: Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: We present a comparison of results on the microscopic structure of liquid parahydrogen as calculated by path-integral Monte Carlo and path-integral-centroid-molecular-dynamics simulations. The radial distribution functions calculated using both approaches are found to be in good agreement. The disagreement between published estimates for the static structure factor are found to arise from different approximations followed for the Fourier transform of heavily truncated data. A comparison of the structure of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions cannot be matched in neutron work for reasons explained at the beginning, and use of x-ray beams will only provide an estimate for g(r) about one order of magnitude less accurate than neutrons. 19 On the other hand, one expects S centroids (Q) to match the result measured using low incident energies since its dynamic counterpart S centroids (Q, ) was found to be in good agreement with experimental spectra, 5,6 and therefore it should come as no surprise that the quantity derived by recourse to Eq. ͑20͒ in an inelastic-scattering measurement 5 matches the present result shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Comparison To Path-integral-molecular-dynamics Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such conditions cannot be matched in neutron work for reasons explained at the beginning, and use of x-ray beams will only provide an estimate for g(r) about one order of magnitude less accurate than neutrons. 19 On the other hand, one expects S centroids (Q) to match the result measured using low incident energies since its dynamic counterpart S centroids (Q, ) was found to be in good agreement with experimental spectra, 5,6 and therefore it should come as no surprise that the quantity derived by recourse to Eq. ͑20͒ in an inelastic-scattering measurement 5 matches the present result shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Comparison To Path-integral-molecular-dynamics Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As referred to above and already explained in detail, 6 the difference in both measurements cannot explained only be by the rather different conditions employed in both experiments. In fact, the liquid peak becomes barely visible in the single-differential cross section reported in Ref.…”
Section: B Comparison To Path-integral-molecular-dynamics Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations