SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1993 1993
DOI: 10.1190/1.1822457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microseismic imaging of hydrofractures with the aid of conical waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring hydraulic fracturing is important because it helps optimize the stimulation process and in assessing the hazards which might be generated from induced seismicity. Conventional monitoring techniques involve methods of hypocenter event relocation (Rutledge and Phillips, 2003), moment tensor inversion for source mechanism (Nolen-Hoeksema and Ruff, 1999;Song and Toksoz, 2011), and travel time tomography for velocity and anisotropy parameter estimation (Idelton et al, 1993). Neither of those techniques address the explicit imaging of the fractures in the vicinity of the stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring hydraulic fracturing is important because it helps optimize the stimulation process and in assessing the hazards which might be generated from induced seismicity. Conventional monitoring techniques involve methods of hypocenter event relocation (Rutledge and Phillips, 2003), moment tensor inversion for source mechanism (Nolen-Hoeksema and Ruff, 1999;Song and Toksoz, 2011), and travel time tomography for velocity and anisotropy parameter estimation (Idelton et al, 1993). Neither of those techniques address the explicit imaging of the fractures in the vicinity of the stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%