2020
DOI: 10.1190/geo2019-0752.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microseismic monitoring using a fibre-optic Distributed Acoustic Sensor (DAS) array

Abstract: We present a case study demonstrating the use of an “L”-shaped downhole fibre-optic array to monitor microseismicity. We use a relatively simple method to detect events from continuous waveform data, and develop a workflow for manual event location. Locations are defined with a cylindrical coordinate system, with the horizontal axis of the DAS cable being the axis of symmetry. Events are located using three manual “picks”, constraining (1) the zero-offset “broadside” channel to the event (2) the P-S wave arriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VSP methods are now applied in other environments, such as at glaciers (Booth et al., 2020). Recently, DAS has been applied to passive seismic investigations including: the study of tectonic earthquakes (Ajo‐Franklin et al., 2019; Dou et al., 2017; Jousset et al., 2018; Lindsey et al., 2019; Sladen et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2018); ambient noise studies (Ajo‐Franklin et al., 2019; Dou et al., 2017; Martin et al., 2018; Spica et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2017); and microseismicity in a variety of settings including hydraulic fracture reservoir stimulation (Baird et al., 2020; Karrenbach et al., 2019; Stork et al., 2020; Verdon et al., 2020), geothermal seismicity (Li & Zhan, 2018), and alpine glacier icequakes (Walter et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VSP methods are now applied in other environments, such as at glaciers (Booth et al., 2020). Recently, DAS has been applied to passive seismic investigations including: the study of tectonic earthquakes (Ajo‐Franklin et al., 2019; Dou et al., 2017; Jousset et al., 2018; Lindsey et al., 2019; Sladen et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2018); ambient noise studies (Ajo‐Franklin et al., 2019; Dou et al., 2017; Martin et al., 2018; Spica et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2017); and microseismicity in a variety of settings including hydraulic fracture reservoir stimulation (Baird et al., 2020; Karrenbach et al., 2019; Stork et al., 2020; Verdon et al., 2020), geothermal seismicity (Li & Zhan, 2018), and alpine glacier icequakes (Walter et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For certain events, it is possible to detect arrivals in the deviated and vertical parts of the well, in which case many previously degenerate planes can be resolved. Furthermore, [ 108 ] uses deviated well recordings to approximately estimate event location without the need for individual channel picking. Instead, they measure several geometrical quantities, evident in the DAS records, and locate events assuming a constant background model.…”
Section: Seismic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAS data provides only a single-component recording (the fiber is sensitive to changes in strain along the fiber, but insensitive to changes broadside to the cable) whereas standard geophones and seismometers can provide three-component recordings. Nevertheless, processing techniques are advancing to determine microseismic event locations (Webster et al, 2016;Verdon et al, 2020) and source mechanisms (Cole et al, 2018;Baird et al, 2020) from DAS data. The technology is also being explored for microseismic monitoring in other industrial settings, for example at geothermal sites (Mondanos and Coleman, 2019), geological CO 2 storage sites and for volcano monitoring.…”
Section: Das For Microseismic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%