1985
DOI: 10.1016/0020-711x(85)90049-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsomal methionine aminopeptidase: Properties of the detergent-solubilized enzyme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sidorowicz et al, 1981), arginine 2-naphthylamide (Hopsu et al, 1966;Freitas et al, 1979) or leucine 2-naphthylamide (Delange & Smith, 1971). This particular feature of MAP has been shown to be responsible for its higher catalytic efficiency (Vmax /Km) for hydrolysis of methionine 2-naphthylamide compared with other amino acid 2-naphthylamides (Freitas et al, 1985). Furthermore, we found that MAP, in contrast with other wellcharacterized aminopeptidases, is not inhibited by EDTA, puromycin or bestatin (Freitas et al, 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sidorowicz et al, 1981), arginine 2-naphthylamide (Hopsu et al, 1966;Freitas et al, 1979) or leucine 2-naphthylamide (Delange & Smith, 1971). This particular feature of MAP has been shown to be responsible for its higher catalytic efficiency (Vmax /Km) for hydrolysis of methionine 2-naphthylamide compared with other amino acid 2-naphthylamides (Freitas et al, 1985). Furthermore, we found that MAP, in contrast with other wellcharacterized aminopeptidases, is not inhibited by EDTA, puromycin or bestatin (Freitas et al, 1985).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This particular feature of MAP has been shown to be responsible for its higher catalytic efficiency (Vmax /Km) for hydrolysis of methionine 2-naphthylamide compared with other amino acid 2-naphthylamides (Freitas et al, 1985). Furthermore, we found that MAP, in contrast with other wellcharacterized aminopeptidases, is not inhibited by EDTA, puromycin or bestatin (Freitas et al, 1985). In addition, the lack of EDTA inhibition indicates that MAP is also distinct from all other known metalloaminopeptidases (Barrett, 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since its discovery in 1976 there have been over 200 publications which relate bestatin and physiological functions, usually via aminopeptidase activity. The following aminopeptidases are inhibited by bestatin: Arg (McDermott et al, 1988), M (Ward et al, 1990;Rich et al, 1984), B (Nishizawa et al, 1977;Harbeson & Rich, 1988), W (Gee & Kenny, 1987), cell surface AP (Aoyagi et al, 1976), AP from erythrocytes (Abramic & Vitale, 1989), AP from cornea (Sharma & Ortwerth, 1987), AP from Aeromonas (Wilkes & Prescott, 1985), and lens AP III (Sharma & Ortwerth, 1986) , but not Met AP (Freitas et al, 1985) or Xanthomonas AP (Osada & Isono, 1986). Bestatin inhibits degradation of endogenous liver proteins (Botbol & Scornik, 1991), enkephalin [most recently treated in Suh andTseng (1990) andBenter et al (1990)], vasopressin (Johnson et al, 1984), melanotropin (Hui et al, 1983), bradykinin (Proud et al, 1987) , angiotensin (Abhold et al, 1987), leukotriene (Hui et al, 1983), and a-bag cell peptide (Squire, et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%