1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf02020372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microspatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ciliates in a small pond

Abstract: Five transects of contiguous samples from the surface of a small pond and one transect from its bottom were collected in order to quantify microspatial heterogeneity in the distribution of ciliated protozoa. Examination of the frequency-abundance relations for these transects suggests that they can be approximated by negative binomial distributions with a commonk of 1.87. Contagiousness or crowding increases with population density.Mean patch size and mean interpatch distance were measured for 4 transects as 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour may be affected by the distribution of prey (Fenchel & Blackburn 1999) or predators (Berryman 1992), or by chemical cues (Buskey & Stoecker 1988, 1989. Although chemotaxis and mechanoreception were first recognised in ciliates more than 100 yr ago (Jennings 1906), and protists are commonly observed to exploit patches of high prey density in situ (Taylor & Berger 1980, Fenchel & Jonsson 1988, Menden-Deuer & Grunbaum 2006, Paffenhöfer et al 2007, understanding the role of chemical-mediated prey location in prey selection, involving attraction to dissolved cues, remains in its infancy. Factors important in chemosensory attraction include proteins, amino acids, and other dissolved inorganic or organic nutrients (Rassoulzadegan 1982, Flynn & Davidson 1993, Ferrier-Pagès et al 1998, Davidson et al 2005.…”
Section: Mechanistic Steps Involved In Selective Protistan Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behaviour may be affected by the distribution of prey (Fenchel & Blackburn 1999) or predators (Berryman 1992), or by chemical cues (Buskey & Stoecker 1988, 1989. Although chemotaxis and mechanoreception were first recognised in ciliates more than 100 yr ago (Jennings 1906), and protists are commonly observed to exploit patches of high prey density in situ (Taylor & Berger 1980, Fenchel & Jonsson 1988, Menden-Deuer & Grunbaum 2006, Paffenhöfer et al 2007, understanding the role of chemical-mediated prey location in prey selection, involving attraction to dissolved cues, remains in its infancy. Factors important in chemosensory attraction include proteins, amino acids, and other dissolved inorganic or organic nutrients (Rassoulzadegan 1982, Flynn & Davidson 1993, Ferrier-Pagès et al 1998, Davidson et al 2005.…”
Section: Mechanistic Steps Involved In Selective Protistan Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has emphasized phytoplankton patchiness at cm scales (Seuront et al 1996, Franks & Jaffe 2001, Lovejoy et al 2001, Waters et al 2003, and ciliate patches 1 to 2 cm in size occur (Taylor & Berger 1980, Kils 1993. Abiotic and biotic processes such as convection currents, smallscale nutrient patches (Seuront et al 2002), reproductive behaviour, predator avoidance, prey/predator ratio, and escape response may be involved in microscale patches generation.…”
Section: Ecological Implications Of Patchiness Scales In the Lagoonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we explore intra‐ and interspecific density‐dependent dispersal in freshwater protists. These organisms are often patchily distributed in ponds and lakes at the scale of millimetres or centimetres (Arlt 1973; Taylor & Berger 1980; Wiackowski 1981; Smirnov & Thar 2003). We use a prey–predator couple, in aquatic experimental microcosms under controlled conditions and investigate the effects of population density on dispersal, and address three questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%