2015
DOI: 10.1159/000439031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microspectroscopic Confocal Raman and Macroscopic Biophysical Measurements in the in vivo Assessment of the Skin Barrier: Perspective for Dermatology and Cosmetic Sciences

Abstract: Skin barrier function, confined to the stratum corneum, is traditionally evaluated using established, noninvasive biophysical methods like transepidermal water loss, capacitance and conductance. However, these methods neither measure skin molecular composition nor its structure, hindering the actual causes of skin barrier change or impairment. At the same time, confocal Raman microspectroscopy (CRS) can directly measure skin molecular composition and structure and has proven itself to be a powerful technique f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the skin barrier function of SS subjects was predominantly analyzed at baseline or after stimulation using these macroscopic biophysical methods and significant differences between SS and NSS subjects could rarely be detected [13,14,16,18,20,26,49,50]. A range of limitations of these easy-to-use, rapid measurements are known [33], and our study demonstrates that more sensitive and specific tools for the in vivo analysis of the skin barrier in general and in SS in particular are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, the skin barrier function of SS subjects was predominantly analyzed at baseline or after stimulation using these macroscopic biophysical methods and significant differences between SS and NSS subjects could rarely be detected [13,14,16,18,20,26,49,50]. A range of limitations of these easy-to-use, rapid measurements are known [33], and our study demonstrates that more sensitive and specific tools for the in vivo analysis of the skin barrier in general and in SS in particular are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy has already established a strong position in non-invasive skin analysis for many applications, ranging from the detection of non-melanoma skin cancer [30] to evaluation of skin barrier composition in AD [31,32]. As CRS is able to detect differences at the molecular level and at a high spatial resolution, it could provide a breakthrough in the evaluation of barrier function involvement in SS, which so far is not possible with macroscopic biophysical techniques [33]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) is a powerful non‐invasive tool to measure depth profiles of molecular components in the SC , in which the skin components are measured depth‐dependently in vivo / ex vivo at high spatial resolution. An area of interest using CRM in dermatology is the analysis of the penetration into the skin , the skin barrier function provided by the SC , and collagen of the dermis . Our group recently introduced methods to determine the molecular properties of skin barrier function‐related parameters, such as water bonding states , ICL ordering and secondary and tertiary structures of keratin in the SC in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used methods to evaluate SC barrier function and hydration include transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and electrical approaches, such as capacitance or conductance, respectively. These rapid, noninvasive, in vivo measurements are easy to perform; however, the electrical approaches are influenced by the ambient environment, topical agents, anatomical site, and the presence of skin appendages . Furthermore, these techniques do not provide specific information regarding molecular level alterations in the skin barrier or the depth profile/spatial distribution of changes in hydration level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%