2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsporidiosis: Epidemiology, clinical data and therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
28

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
97
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, light microscope does not work when the stool contains undetectable levels of spores; this is consistent with Gumbo et al 48 In Zimbabwe, microsporidia was detected in 18%, 51% of diarrhea patients by microscopic and PCR, respectively. These findings were supported by others who reported PCR is more sensitive(100%) compared to microscopic techniques in detecting microsporidial infection in HIV + patients 34,49,50 .The increased sensitivity of PCR can be attributed to lower threshold of microsporidia (10 2 spores/g stool) compared to optical microscopy in which the cut-off point ranges from 10 4 to 10 6 spores 51 . Althoughtrichrome staining is are liable and an available technique for detection of microsporidian spores in vitro, detection process is difficult and time-consuming for staining 46,52 .Moreover, higher prevalence of E. bieneusi compared to E. intestinalis has been reported in some studies 29,36,53 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, light microscope does not work when the stool contains undetectable levels of spores; this is consistent with Gumbo et al 48 In Zimbabwe, microsporidia was detected in 18%, 51% of diarrhea patients by microscopic and PCR, respectively. These findings were supported by others who reported PCR is more sensitive(100%) compared to microscopic techniques in detecting microsporidial infection in HIV + patients 34,49,50 .The increased sensitivity of PCR can be attributed to lower threshold of microsporidia (10 2 spores/g stool) compared to optical microscopy in which the cut-off point ranges from 10 4 to 10 6 spores 51 . Althoughtrichrome staining is are liable and an available technique for detection of microsporidian spores in vitro, detection process is difficult and time-consuming for staining 46,52 .Moreover, higher prevalence of E. bieneusi compared to E. intestinalis has been reported in some studies 29,36,53 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Albendazole and fumagillin are the main drugs used to treat E. bieneusi infections (7). However, relapse is often observed after albendazole withdrawal and the efficacy of fumagillin is counterbalanced by its adverse effects, with fumagillin exhibiting bone marrow toxicity leading to thrombocytopenia and neutropenia (1,7). Here, a complete recovery was obtained with nitazoxanide.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…are the major species infecting humans, with E. bieneusi being the most prevalent (10,15). Transmission occurs mainly through fecal-oral routes, with sources of infection including other infected humans and animals, contaminated water, and, as illustrated recently, food (1,4). Microsporidia have emerged as an important cause of opportunistic infection in patients with AIDS, being predominantly associated with wasting and diarrhea.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disseminated microsporidiosis is dominated by a febrile systemic inflammatory response, with rapid development of pneumonia and encephalitis, which is often fatal. The treatment of choice is albendazole (Anane & Attouchi, 2010 FO. & Maki, DG.…”
Section: Microsporidiasismentioning
confidence: 99%