1943
DOI: 10.2307/2804876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microsteris, Phlox, and an Intermediate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that this relationship will hold with increased sampling of western Phlox taxa and additional sampling of M. gracilis. Notable differences exist between the genera with respect to flower and seed morphology (see Wherry, 1943Wherry, , 1955Grant, 1959); moreover, the annual habit is independently derived in Microsteris, which is clearly not closely related to P. drummondii as hypothesized by Mason (1941) when he argued for lumping the two genera. Segregation of the monotypic Microsteris thus becomes a judgment call on the taxonomic significance of the characters in question.…”
Section: Implications Of Congruence Between the Cpdna And Its Phylogementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that this relationship will hold with increased sampling of western Phlox taxa and additional sampling of M. gracilis. Notable differences exist between the genera with respect to flower and seed morphology (see Wherry, 1943Wherry, , 1955Grant, 1959); moreover, the annual habit is independently derived in Microsteris, which is clearly not closely related to P. drummondii as hypothesized by Mason (1941) when he argued for lumping the two genera. Segregation of the monotypic Microsteris thus becomes a judgment call on the taxonomic significance of the characters in question.…”
Section: Implications Of Congruence Between the Cpdna And Its Phylogementioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, six samples of western taxa were included (four species). We also sampled the monotypic genus Microsteris, which is clearly closely related to Phlox based on molecular phylogenetic studies of the family Polemoniaceae (Steele and Vilgalys, 1994;Johnson et al, 1996;Porter, 1996;Bell, Patterson, and Hamilton, 1999;Prather, Ferguson, and Jansen, 2000) as well as morphological data (Wherry, 1943;Grant, 1959Grant, , 1998. The segregation of this genus has been controversial: some workers have recognized Microsteris gracilis within Phlox as P. gracilis (Hook.)…”
Section: Sampling and Dna Extraction-seventy-sixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in these Phlox species there is little evidence for pollinator-mediated barriers to reproduction. All five species in our study have broadly geographically overlapping ranges (Wherry, 1955; Figure 1), and some even grow in immediate vicinity to each other. They have distinct flowering time peaks but broadly overlapping flowering periods, 'distinct but not mutually exclusive habitat requirements' (Hadley & Levin, 1969), and likely the same pollinators (Robertson, 1891(Robertson, , 1895(Robertson, , 1928Wherry, 1932Wherry, , 1933Grant & Grant, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here, we investigate the mechanisms driving mechanical isolation between long and short styled species of Phlox wildflowers. Phlox is a genus of flowering plants with more than 60 species that are predominantly found in Northern America (Wherry, 1955;Ferguson & Jansen, 2002). The species used in this study, P. glaberrima ssp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phlox L. is a predominantly North American plant genus comprising c . 65 species (Wherry 1955), making it the largest genus of the well-studied family Polemoniaceae (Grant 1959;Porter & Johnson 2000). Phlox has been and continues to be an important system for plant evolutionary studies.…”
Section: Received 12 April 2007; Revision Accepted 4 June 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%