2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11147-009-9039-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural biases in empirical tests of option pricing models

Abstract: Option pricing, Microstructure, Jump-diffusion, Risk-neutral moments, G13,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, at a spacing just above 4.5 dollar between strikes, risk‐neutral skewness takes a value smaller than –0.4, compared to the true value of 0. Dennis and Mayhew () make a similar finding about the domain width, that is, how far option data extends into the tails. In their normally distributed example of a stock with a volatility of 20% the skewness estimates are only unbiased if the strike prices extend about 20% into both tails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, at a spacing just above 4.5 dollar between strikes, risk‐neutral skewness takes a value smaller than –0.4, compared to the true value of 0. Dennis and Mayhew () make a similar finding about the domain width, that is, how far option data extends into the tails. In their normally distributed example of a stock with a volatility of 20% the skewness estimates are only unbiased if the strike prices extend about 20% into both tails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In theory, the estimation of risk‐neutral moments based on the theorem of Breeden and Litzenberger () is an easy exercise given that a continuum of option prices is available. However, the practical estimation of risk‐neutral densities from empirical option data is subject to many biases from discrete option prices and microstructural noise (e.g., Bliss & Panigirtzoglou, ; Dennis & Mayhew, ). These biases may also be reflected in the results of empirical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the studies claim that the violations are caused by market microstructural noises and overlook other possibilities. Dennis and Mayhew (2009) suggest that much of the violations are influenced by microstructural biases. Lin et al (2011) andP erignon (2006) attribute the violations to tactical trading effects and microstructure factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%