2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural characterization and constitutive modeling of deformation of closed-cell foams based on in situ x-ray tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that VGStudio MAX software was used to reconstruct CT slice images and count the equivalent diameter of cells and the thickness of cell walls. The main steps can be summarized as follows: (i) Applying the global thresholding segmentation (TS) method to binarize an image into the solid phase and air phase; (ii) applying the top-hat method to recover thin walls not extracted by TS; (iii) calculating the solid fraction and comparing it with the experimental data; then, thresholds were adjusted, and steps (i) and (ii) were repeated until the calculated and measured parameters reached consistently; and (iv) applying the classic watershed for cell partitioning and quantifying the cell morphology . The reconstructed microstructure and the equivalent diameter of the cells are shown in Figures and , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that VGStudio MAX software was used to reconstruct CT slice images and count the equivalent diameter of cells and the thickness of cell walls. The main steps can be summarized as follows: (i) Applying the global thresholding segmentation (TS) method to binarize an image into the solid phase and air phase; (ii) applying the top-hat method to recover thin walls not extracted by TS; (iii) calculating the solid fraction and comparing it with the experimental data; then, thresholds were adjusted, and steps (i) and (ii) were repeated until the calculated and measured parameters reached consistently; and (iv) applying the classic watershed for cell partitioning and quantifying the cell morphology . The reconstructed microstructure and the equivalent diameter of the cells are shown in Figures and , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main steps can be summarized as follows: (i) Applying the global thresholding segmentation (TS) method to binarize an image into the solid phase and air phase; (ii) applying the top-hat method 28 to recover thin walls not extracted by TS; (iii) calculating the solid fraction and comparing it with the experimental data; then, thresholds were adjusted, and steps (i) and (ii) were repeated until the calculated and measured parameters reached consistently; 29 and (iv) applying the classic watershed for cell partitioning and quantifying the cell morphology. 30 The reconstructed microstructure and the equivalent diameter of the cells are shown in Figures 4 and 5 , respectively. Through the statistical analysis, the equivalent pore diameter of the foam core follows the Gaussian distribution with an average equivalent diameter of 0.45 mm and a variance of 0.03.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ X-ray tomography has been developed rapidly these years for studying the evolution of 3D structures of cellular materials during compression. [19][20][21][22][23] Kader et al [20] correlated the geometrical and topological characteristics with the deforming microstructure of high porosity aluminum foams (>80%) under dynamic loading. Digital volume correlation (DVC) can be used to characterize the interior strain concentration based on the tomography results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24,25] Jiroušek et al [25] tracked the deforming evolution of aluminum foam at low strain conditions using DVC algorithm. Assisted with in situ X-ray tomography and DVC, Chai et al [21,22] determined the spatial distribution of the weakest cell walls by an edge segmentation method and strength index of cell walls, and porosities of the studied PMI foams were both larger than 90%. The 3D deformation of low porosity PDMS foam (40-60%) during compression was also studied, but the morphology influence of individual cells was not clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation