2015
DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/23/8/085003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural comparison of the kinematics of discrete and continuum dislocations models

Abstract: The Continuum Dislocation Dynamics (CDD) theory and the Discrete Dislocation Dynamics (DDD) method are compared based on concise mathematical formulations of the coarse graining of discrete data. A numerical tool for converting from a discrete to a continuum representation of a given dislocation configuration is developed, which allows to directly compare both simulation approaches based on continuum quantities (e.g. scalar density, geometrically necessary densities, mean curvature). Investigating the evolutio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The D2C method converts geometrical properties of discrete dislocation lines into continuous field variables [21]. Since geometrical dislocation lines are onedimensional objects embedded in a three-dimensional space a point-wise comparison between two dislocation structures is difficult.…”
Section: The Discrete-to-continuum (D2c) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The D2C method converts geometrical properties of discrete dislocation lines into continuous field variables [21]. Since geometrical dislocation lines are onedimensional objects embedded in a three-dimensional space a point-wise comparison between two dislocation structures is difficult.…”
Section: The Discrete-to-continuum (D2c) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the density and curvature of dislocations with line orientation ϕ (i.e., the angle between the line tangent and the Burgers vector) is given by the variables ρ(r, ϕ) and k(r, ϕ) [39], where r denotes the spatial coordinates of a point. These two variables can easily be obtained from discrete dislocations since the line length and average line orientation in an averaging volume can be computed and also the curvature can be derived from basic geometrical relations (please refer to [18] and [21] for further details).…”
Section: The Discrete-to-continuum (D2c) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we propose a different approach towards characterizing, validating, and data mining of dislocation data based on one of the information-richest CDD models that resulted from the theory by Hochrainer [14,15,20,21]. Although this CDD model is able to describe the evolution of dislocations in great detail [22], we only will use the underlying field variables consisting of density and line curvature data (and possibly higher-order moments thereof). Together with converting data from lower scale methods or experiments into these mesoscale field variables we arrive at a description that is -unlike discrete dislocation data -defined in each point of the volume under consideration, which, e.g., allows to simply "take the difference" between two data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%