This article reviews the phenomena involved during the annealing of cold worked austenitic stainless steels. Initially the cold worked state is discussed, with special emphasis on the formation of deformation induced martensites. Following, the phenomena of martensite reversion, recovery, recrystallization and grain growth are discussed. The interactions between primary recrystallization and precipitation and between precipitate dissolution and secondary recrystallization are dealt with in detail. Finally, the textures resulting from hot and cold working, and from primary and secondary recrystallization, are presented.KEY WORDS: austenitic stainless steels; work hardening; recovery; recrystallization; grain growth; texture.cold working can be correlated to a lower SFE. 39) Deformation twinning is also dependent on SFE and grain size. Low SFE and large grain size favor deformation twinning. Recent work 40) has shown that deformation twin initiation requires a critical deformation (critical dislocation density). The SFE has an indirect effect by increasing dislocation density and strain hardening in low-SFE fcc metals and alloys. 40) Another aspect that must be remembered is that SFE of the ASSs increases with deformation temperature. 41) In summary, depending on the value of the SFE, two different microstructures may be observed in the cold worked ASSs: for a high SFE, a cellular dislocation distribution without DIM and, for a low SFE, a planar dislocation distribution containing DIM. It is worthy of note that deformation bands can be found in both.In terms of recrystallization, the lower is the SFE, keeping all others variables constant, the larger will be the stored energy during deformation and the corresponding driving force for recrystallization. This subject will be discussed later on in greater detail.ASSs are commonly considered to be materials having a low SFE. Actually the SFE of this class of steels are within quite a large range. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Fig. 2(b)). Several interesting features can observed in this figure. Microstructural analysis using optical microscopy, as shown in Fig. 2(a) for a high SFE ASS, does not allow differentiation between high and low SFE austenitic stainless steels after cold working. Furthermore, at the transmission electron microscopy scale deformation bands may be seen eventually (compare Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)). Monteiro and Kestenbach 49) using transmission electron microscopy observed that dislocation substructure is orientation sensitive, i.e., individual grains develop different substructures, according to their specific orientation and the orientation of their neighbours.As previously mentioned, two types of martensite may occur in the ASSs, namely: aЈ-(bcc, ferromagnetic) and e-(hcp, paramagnetic). The typical lattice parameters are: a aЈ ϭ0.2872 nm and a e ϭ0.2532 nm; c e ϭ0.4114 nm Assuming 50) a g ϭ0.3585 nm, we may conclude that the g→aЈ transformation leads to volume increase of about ISIJ International, Vol. 43 (2003) where the contents are in wt%. Since ...