2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11041-012-9473-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and mechanical properties of medium-carbon steel subjected to severe plastic deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before SPD processing the samples were water-quenched with preliminary heating at 800°C for 1 h. SPD processing was conducted by high-pressure torsion (HPT) at an elevated temperature of 350°C with a number of turns N = 5 and a pressure of P = 5 GPa [13,14]. The processing was performed on disk samples with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before SPD processing the samples were water-quenched with preliminary heating at 800°C for 1 h. SPD processing was conducted by high-pressure torsion (HPT) at an elevated temperature of 350°C with a number of turns N = 5 and a pressure of P = 5 GPa [13,14]. The processing was performed on disk samples with a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for such a deviation is the complexity of microstructures from SPD processing, which is especially typical of multiphase materials. For instance, during SPD processing of carbon steels, in addition to grain refinement, dissolution of cementite particles has been discovered [10,11], as well as formation of segregations of carbon and cementite particles at the boundaries of nanocrystalline grains formed through deformation [12][13][14][15][16]. This provides an opportunity to realize a set of strengthening mechanisms in UFG carbon steels; in particular, in addition to the grain boundary strengthening mechanism, also the dislocation strengthening, precipitate strengthening and solid solution strengthening mechanisms [12,15], as well as the new strengthening mechanism associated with solute segregation at grain boundaries [15,16], make their contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dobatkin et al deformed martensitic 0.14 wt% C and 0.1 wt% C‐B steels via equal‐channel angular pressing at 300 °C and proved the enhanced strength and more uniform microstructure after additional subsequent annealing as compared to the ferritic‐pearlitic counterparts as starting materials . Ganeev, Karavaeva et al investigated the deformation of martensitic 0.1 wt% C and 0.45 wt% C steels using HPT . A hardness increase as compared to the as‐quenched state and an ultimate tensile strength of 2.65 GPa was reported for 0.45 wt% C martensitic carbon steel after HPT deformation at 350 °C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganeev, Karavaeva et al investigated the deformation of martensitic 0.1 wt% C and 0.45 wt% C steels using HPT . A hardness increase as compared to the as‐quenched state and an ultimate tensile strength of 2.65 GPa was reported for 0.45 wt% C martensitic carbon steel after HPT deformation at 350 °C . The effect of various deformation temperatures was only investigated in one of the studies and resulted in a maximum hardness of a 0.45 wt% C martensitic steel for a deformation temperature of 350 °C in the investigated temperature range from 300 to 450 °C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of these constituents to strengthening is determined primarily by the deformation temperature. It has been shown [24,25] that at room temperature the dissolution of second-phase particles prevails, but as the deformation temperature is increased, precipitation is observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%