2022
DOI: 10.1002/adem.202101037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and Tensile Behavior of a Novel Monocrystalline Co‐Based Superalloy at Different Temperatures

Abstract: Microstructures and tensile properties of a novel monocrystalline Co‐based superalloy are investigated by experiments and finite element simulation. Microstructures of heat‐treated alloys are composed of γ and cubical γ' precipitates without the presence of the secondary phase, and the fraction of γ' phase is about 86%. The experimental results show that tensile properties of the novel monocrystalline Co‐based superalloy have abnormal yield behavior. In low and medium temperature ranges (R.T. 850 °C), the yiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate high reliability and accuracy comparable to the experiment [21,22]. Structure evolution is often studied experimentally using differential scanning calorimetry, a scanning electron microscope, and an electron probe microanalyzer, and these results match well with those predicted based on first-principles calculations [23]. However, the ability of the ab initio method for the deep investigation of crystal lattice properties is usually limited by the size of the computational cell.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These results demonstrate high reliability and accuracy comparable to the experiment [21,22]. Structure evolution is often studied experimentally using differential scanning calorimetry, a scanning electron microscope, and an electron probe microanalyzer, and these results match well with those predicted based on first-principles calculations [23]. However, the ability of the ab initio method for the deep investigation of crystal lattice properties is usually limited by the size of the computational cell.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Inconel 600 [16] 1627 312 616.8 1591.0 0.700 2 Inconel 690 [16] 1616 373 675.0 1503.0 0.480 3 Inconel 718 [15] 1603 298 931.9 2291.0 0.590 4 Inconel 718 [4] 1603 298 1450.0 2291.0 0.590 5 Inconel 625 [5] 1623 298 958.4 1911.6 0.306 6 Inconel 617 [8] 1653 298 805.0 2018.3 0.630 7 Inconel 617 [23] 1653 298 768.5 1925.5 0.630 8 Inconel 750 [42] 1703 296 825.9 1848.0 0.470 9 Inconel 750 [42] 1703 296 1238.9 2252.0 0.239 10 Incoloy 800 H [48] 1658 298 563.1 994.1 0.211 11 Co-30Ni-10Al [49] 1668 296 750.0 2575 0.927 12 Co-16Ni-6.3Al [50] 1671 293 736.6 2299 0.650 includes almost all the superalloys in the Inconel family. The information from the comparison directly is fetched directly and it can be seen that a good agreement between model predictions and experimental data is achieved on the whole.…”
Section: Verification Of the Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] superalloy Co-30Ni-10Al. [49] 800 H at room temperature are derived from stress-strain data reported in the study by Bruch et al [43] . The melting point temperatures of Co-30Ni-10Al [44] and Co-16Ni-6.3Al [45] were adopted from the reported melting point data for alloys with similar compositions to their compositions.…”
Section: Verification Of the Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%