2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(02)01034-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure of irradiated ferritic/martensitic steels in relation to mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also reported by Schaeublin that the irradiation hardening of proton-irradiated F82H-IEA could not be explained by the irradiation-induced dislocation loops, and it was suggested the effects were due to very fine precipitates, which were observed as black spots. 4) In addition to these, the effect of precipitates on grain boundaries on hardness was reported by Ohmura by comparing nano-hardness versus micro-hardness over Fe-C alloys. 5) These investigations suggested the possibility that precipitation under irradiation could have a large impact on mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was also reported by Schaeublin that the irradiation hardening of proton-irradiated F82H-IEA could not be explained by the irradiation-induced dislocation loops, and it was suggested the effects were due to very fine precipitates, which were observed as black spots. 4) In addition to these, the effect of precipitates on grain boundaries on hardness was reported by Ohmura by comparing nano-hardness versus micro-hardness over Fe-C alloys. 5) These investigations suggested the possibility that precipitation under irradiation could have a large impact on mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Microhardness tests were performed on the specimens at different irradiation doses and the obtained results were related to the strength of the unirradiated material. TEM specimens prepared with special technique [9] were investigated in a JEOL2010 electron microscope with LaB 6 gun, high tilt lens, operated at 200 kV. The microstructure of the irradiated samples was analyzed using the bright field, dark field and weak beam conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the damage accumulation in ferritic/martensitic steel with bcc structure is less than in other metals such as stainless steel or pure fcc metals [8]. After high energy proton/neutron irradiations to low doses, transmission electron microscopy observation reveals in F/M steel F82H unidentified defects the so-called 'black dot' [7,8] possibly interstitial clusters, with sizes ranging from 1 to 2 nm [9,10]. In another ferritic/martensitic steel, Optimax, the irradiation induced hardening reduces the total elongation and shifts the DBTT value to higher temperatures, which is due to the formation of nanocavities and small sized defect clusters [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the typical value of a for dislocation networks is <0.1, [29][30][31] as they are considered to be weak obstacles to the moving dislocations segments. Further, it has been shown that, for a random array of obstacles, the value of the barrier strength coefficient is~70 pct of that assumed for a periodic array [32,33] (based on microstructural observations), and results show that the dislocation distribution is rather nonuniform in T91.…”
Section: Role Of Internal Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%