Innovative structured catalyst supports,
like solid foams, wire
gauzes, and short-channel structures, are considered in methane catalytic
combustion. For comparison, classical supports such as packed beds
and monoliths are also taken into account. Moreover, two catalysts,
displaying “fast” and “slow” kinetics,
are examined. The performance efficiency criterion is applied to account
for a balance between the process conversion, mass transfer, and flow
resistance. Another “technological” approach compares
reactor length and the corresponding pressure drop required to reach
the desired conversion rate. Results indicate that wire gauze, solid
foam, and short-channel structure are highly promising catalyst supports
due to their intense heat/mass transfer and moderate flow resistance,
particularly for fast catalytic reactions. For slow reactions, monoliths
seem to be the best as they exhibit the lowest flow resistance.