Over the past decade, interest in electrochemical capacitors as an energy-storage technology has increased enormously, spurring the development and evaluation of a large number of new materials and device configurations. This perspective article aims to propose guidelines by which new materials and devices should be evaluated, and how resulting data should be reported with respect to critical metrics such as capacitance, energy and power. In recent years the number of publications dedicated to electrochemical capacitors (ECs) has increased enormously, while drawing from a diverse community of researchers in the fields of electrochemistry, material science, and engineering.1,2 Contributions from such different perspectives have been invaluable to the advancement of EC science and technology, but has also resulted in some confusion in the corresponding scientific literature because of the wide range of materials (active and inactive), device configurations, and electrochemical testing protocols that are used.
Current StatusUnfortunately, a comparison of the electrochemical properties of materials for EC is often challenging because key experimental parameters and procedures are not fully described in literature reports, and in some cases data from single electrode experiments are improperly extrapolated to projected device performance. Inconsistency in reporting key performance metrics hinders the comparison of data from different laboratories on otherwise related materials and devices.
1,2The present perspective article identifies some useful guidelines for correctly evaluating the electrochemical performance of EC materials and devices and reporting on the resulting findings.
Future Needs and ProspectsMaterials for ECs (electrode and electrolyte).-When a new (active) material is proposed, its synthesis procedure should be described in detail sufficient to allow for replication in another laboratory; basic material properties should be also reported (particle/crystallite/film morphology, crystal structure, etc). Any electrode preparation using the resulting materials must be clearly described, including information on the respective ratios (or weight %) between active material, conductive agent (if present) and binder(s) used in electrode fabrication. Furthermore, one should report the active material mass loading per electrode area, for example in units of mg cm −2 . This information is essential for readers to clearly evaluate the electrochemical performance of both the active material and full device, particularly when comparing against results from other laboratories or from commercial products. Authors should consider that the mass loading of commercialized activated carbon electrodes is ∼10 mg cm −2 . * Electrochemical Society Member. z E-mail: andrea.balducci@uni-jena.de When a new electrolyte component (solvent or salt) is proposed, the composition of the investigated electrolyte should be clearly described, for example with concentration of the salts noted in units of mol L −1 . The viscosity and ionic c...