2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

microTSS: accurate microRNA transcription start site identification reveals a significant number of divergent pri-miRNAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Morton et al (2014) provide a machine-learning based plant study addressing miRNA TSSs as a subcategory of Pol II TSSs. The most recent whole-genome prediction efforts in animals (Bhattacharyya et al, 2012;Georgakilas et al, 2014) focus predominantly on data such as histone modifications, although one can train a remarkably successful TSS prediction model based on sequence alone for Pol II TSSs (Morton et al, 2015); sequence-only based models are particularly useful in organisms where epigenetic data sets are still sparse. The overall machine learning paradigm is to first identify a training set composed of representative TSS locations (in case of miRNAs this may come from other Pol II genes) and non-TSS locations.…”
Section: Using Machine Learning To Identify Elements Predictive Of Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morton et al (2014) provide a machine-learning based plant study addressing miRNA TSSs as a subcategory of Pol II TSSs. The most recent whole-genome prediction efforts in animals (Bhattacharyya et al, 2012;Georgakilas et al, 2014) focus predominantly on data such as histone modifications, although one can train a remarkably successful TSS prediction model based on sequence alone for Pol II TSSs (Morton et al, 2015); sequence-only based models are particularly useful in organisms where epigenetic data sets are still sparse. The overall machine learning paradigm is to first identify a training set composed of representative TSS locations (in case of miRNAs this may come from other Pol II genes) and non-TSS locations.…”
Section: Using Machine Learning To Identify Elements Predictive Of Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have systematically identified genomic locations of the promoters and transcription start sites (TSSs) of miRNAs by integrating chromatin signatures such as H3K4me3 histone modifications, nucleosome position, cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) tags, and high-throughput TSS sequencing (TSS-Seq) (Marson et al 2008;Ozsolak et al 2008;Megraw et al 2009;Chien et al 2011;Marsico et al 2013;Georgakilas et al 2014;Xiao et al 2014). Nevertheless, while providing valuable information regarding the boundaries of miRNA transcription units, these approaches do not provide annotation of the often complex splicing patterns of miRNA primary transcripts, and thus provide an incomplete picture of miRNA gene structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identifi ed interactions can be accessed through the accompanying link ( 5 ). miRPath v3.0 offers numerous options: users can select the analysis mode ( 6 ), use of FDR or conservative statistics ( 7 ), thresholds ( 8 ), or to employ empirical or hypergeometric distributions ( 9 ). Advanced visualizations are created in high resolution ( 10 ).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requested graphs are shown by pressing the "Graphs" button ( 8 ). The regulator identifi cation (miRNAs or TFs ) modules can be directly invoked following a parallel miRNA and mRNA differential expression analysis ( 9 ). Top results can be exported to miRPath for further functional investigation ( 10 ).…”
Section: Selecting Candidate Mirnas For Downstream Studies From Ngs Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation