2011
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.087965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubule remodelling is required for the front–rear polarity switch during contact inhibition of locomotion

Abstract: SummaryWhen migrating mesenchymal cells collide, they exhibit a 'contact inhibition of locomotion' response that results in reversal of their front-rear polarity by extension of a new leading edge, which enables their migration away from the opposing contacted cell. The critical cytoskeletal rearrangements underpinning these mutual repulsion events are currently unknown. We found that during fibroblast cell-cell collisions, microtubules at the region of contact increase their frequency of catastrophe, their ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
70
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, our data can be interpreted as showing preferential recruitment and increased growth rate of MTs at cell-extracellular-matrix contacts versus cell-cell contacts, in relation to the establishment of a front-rear cell polarity required for migration (Kadir et al, 2011). These data are consistent with previous observations of a clear bias of MT growth towards the free edge of cells at the border of cell islands (Dupin et al, 2009;Jaulin and Kreitzer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Accordingly, our data can be interpreted as showing preferential recruitment and increased growth rate of MTs at cell-extracellular-matrix contacts versus cell-cell contacts, in relation to the establishment of a front-rear cell polarity required for migration (Kadir et al, 2011). These data are consistent with previous observations of a clear bias of MT growth towards the free edge of cells at the border of cell islands (Dupin et al, 2009;Jaulin and Kreitzer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When fibroblasts with normal motility collide, they undergo temporary paralysis of movement and then divert their paths to avoid contact in a phenomenon known as contact inhibition of locomotion, which was first described by Michael Abercrombie and Joan Heaysman in the early 1950s [90,91]. The cell overlap shown by IRM here indicates that ROCK inhibition causes a release from contact inhibition of locomotion, as reported before [92][93][94], and reviewed by Mayor and Carmona-Fontaine [95]. A consequence of contact inhibition of locomotion is that sparse cells will translocate faster than more numerous cells due to a lesser number of collisions [90].…”
Section: Functional Consequences Of Irs-1 Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, by the selective stabilization of microtubules at the leading edge, cell polarity is established, and cells can move directionally up a chemical gradient or toward an open wound. In the latter assay, it is unclear whether selective stabilization occurs at the leading edge because of molecules released by cells damaged during the formation of the wound or whether there is selective destabilization (increased dynamicity) at the rear of the cell caused by cell-to-cell contact as has been reported in other studies (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%