1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)42399-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microtubules grow and shorten at intrinsically variable rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
53
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…fIRth = ASotherh5.6 (Spolar and Record, 1994). Horio and Hotani, 1986;Gildersleeve et al, 1992). It is also 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fIRth = ASotherh5.6 (Spolar and Record, 1994). Horio and Hotani, 1986;Gildersleeve et al, 1992). It is also 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is of interest because Chretien et al (1995) have proposed a linkage between GTP hydrolysis and the closure of sheet-like extension off growing microtubules into a microtubule cylinder. They suggest that variable rates of closure may regulate the variable rate of microtubule growth observed by video-enhanced DIC (differential interference contrast microscopy) (Gildersleeve et al, 1992). Although the results of Chretien et al (1995) are based on kinetic experiments, they suggest that microtubules grown with a nonhydrolyzable analog, GMPCPP, may have a greater tendency to form sheets than microtubules.…”
Section: Enthalpy-entropy Compensation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the work presented here, it is important to recognize that the relevant observations are the behaviors of the systems at different scales and the concurrence (or disagreement) between the values of CC that result from various definitions or measurement approaches; the specific numerical CC values observed are simply outcomes of the particular input kinetic rate constants used and so are not by themselves significant. This situation is analogous to physical MTs, where DI parameters and CC values depend on the protein sequences, temperatures, and buffer conditions used (e.g., Williams et al, 1985;Gildersleeve et al, 1992;Fygenson et al, 1994;Hussmann et al, 2016;Schummel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Approach To Understanding the Relationship Between Microtubule Behaviors And Critical Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT dynamic instability has the following parameters: MT polymerization (growth) and depolymerization (shrinkage, shortening) rates, catastrophe (transition from polymerization to depolymerization) and rescue (transition from depolymerization to polymerization) frequencies, as well as pauses-states when MTs are not polymerized or depolymerized [12]. All parameters are finely regulated in a cell; the polymerization and depolymerization rates of individual MT can vary significantly both in cell and in different types of cells [13][14][15].…”
Section: Microtubules (Mts) and Their Properties Necessary For The Neuron's Development And Functioningmentioning
confidence: 99%