2009
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvascular obstruction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract: Successful revascularization of the epicardial coronary artery can be achieved in over 90% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. However, postprocedural microvascular obstruction, despite the presence of normal epicardial flow, remains an important limitation which substantially reduces the beneficial effects of PCI. In this review article, a number of different methods available to diagnose microvascular obstruction after PCI are outlined. We also discussed the various pharmacological and me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, factors which are known to impact on the development of MVO such as the presence of comorbid conditions, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy and MI size were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. MVO results in poor myocardial perfusion despite epicardial coronary artery revascularisation, and its development has been attributed to a variety of factors including distal embolisation, endothelial dysfunction, leucocyte migration and plugging and platelet aggregation 13. The mechanism underlying the increased incidence of MVO following PPCI in the rhEPOβ-treated group in our study is unknown but may be attributed to the increased platelet reactivity and the prothrombotic effects which have been described with rhEPO therapy in healthy subjects and a number of different disease states 14 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, factors which are known to impact on the development of MVO such as the presence of comorbid conditions, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy and MI size were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. MVO results in poor myocardial perfusion despite epicardial coronary artery revascularisation, and its development has been attributed to a variety of factors including distal embolisation, endothelial dysfunction, leucocyte migration and plugging and platelet aggregation 13. The mechanism underlying the increased incidence of MVO following PPCI in the rhEPOβ-treated group in our study is unknown but may be attributed to the increased platelet reactivity and the prothrombotic effects which have been described with rhEPO therapy in healthy subjects and a number of different disease states 14 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians must therefore rely considerably on cardiac biomarkers. However, this is not without difficulties, as a definite cut-off value for prognostic significance has not been established for the present sensitive cardiac biomarkers, and the nature of the association between elevated biomarkers after PCI and prognosis is still under discussion [ 2 , 3 , 15 21 ]. The question is whether increased all-cause mortality is caused by acute PCI-related myocardial necrosis or whether the elevations of biomarkers is due to diffuse cTn release functioning as a general indicator of increased risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, impaired angiographic reflow is seen on some patients' angiographies despite opening up the epicardial coronary vessels in the setting of pPCI. This phenomenon is called no-reflow and is a predictor of poor outcomes [2]. The no-reflow phenomenon may be caused by multiple factors that eventually lead to distal microvascular obstruction and endothelial dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%