2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvesicles released from Giardia intestinalis disturb host-pathogen response in vitro

Abstract: a b s t r a c tGiardia intestinalis (G.I), is an anaerobic protozoan and the aetiological agent of giardiasis, a diarrhoea present worldwide and associated with poverty. G.I has a simple life cycle alternating between cyst and trophozoite. Cysts are transmitted orally to the stomach and transform to trophozoites in the intestine by a multifactorial process. Recently, microvesicles (MVs) have been found to be released from a wide range of eukaryotic cells. We have observed a release of MVs during the life cycle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, both PAD-inhibitor and CBD were able to decrease adhesion of Giardia to mammalian cells, similar to as our group previously observed with the cholesterol-chelating agent methyl-β-cyclodextrin treatment (Evans-Osses et al, 2017). For our protozoa model in the current study, Cl-amidine regulated LEVs specifically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, both PAD-inhibitor and CBD were able to decrease adhesion of Giardia to mammalian cells, similar to as our group previously observed with the cholesterol-chelating agent methyl-β-cyclodextrin treatment (Evans-Osses et al, 2017). For our protozoa model in the current study, Cl-amidine regulated LEVs specifically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The first objective was to obtain different EV populations from G. intestinalis. The previous protocol (Evans-Osses et al, 2017) was slightly modified to separate putative large extracellular (LEV) and small extracellular vesicles (SEV) from the total extracellular vesicles described before (Fig.1A). Two different EV populations were recovered from this method: LEVs at 15,000xg and SEVs at 100,000xg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations