Loughborough Antennas &Amp; Propagation Conference (LAPC 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2017.0302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave apparatus for testing breast integrity based on Huygens principle: clinical validation on 16 subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When ideal skin suppression is used, as displayed in Figure 3a, no beamformer has a practical sensitivity. If adipose and fibroglandular reference subtraction is performed, the beamformers have improved performance that is within the range of reported sensitivity estimates in the literature (74-100% in [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37]). The specificity of the DAS and DMAS beamformers was observed to be worse than a random classifier acting on images of healthy breasts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When ideal skin suppression is used, as displayed in Figure 3a, no beamformer has a practical sensitivity. If adipose and fibroglandular reference subtraction is performed, the beamformers have improved performance that is within the range of reported sensitivity estimates in the literature (74-100% in [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37]). The specificity of the DAS and DMAS beamformers was observed to be worse than a random classifier acting on images of healthy breasts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The other study estimated the specificity to be 20% and estimated the specificity using five phantoms [32]. Neither estimates were promising, and while the sensitivity of BMS has been estimated in several publications and has been reported to be between 74% and 100% [8,9,[32][33][34][35][36][37], insufficient attention has been awarded to the specificity of the modality, which must be considered in tandem with the sensitivity.…”
Section: The Diagnostic Performance Of Das Dmas and Orrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides, there are few different techniques to construct images from the breast tissue, such as microwave tomography and ultrawideband (UWB) radar. Some of the microwave breast screening methods have been patented [12]- [13] and achieved clinical trial stage [14]- [16]. However, all of these solutions are of large size and targeted for hospital use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a small, dense breast may have a smaller SMR/MMR than a large, low-density breast with a single fibroglandular inclusion located relatively superficially. In addition to these dependencies on factors unrelated to tumour presence (breast size, imaging domain size), the authors of [132] also identified that the metric fails in the case of a large lesion. In describing an individual patient with a 4 cm carcinoma, the researchers stated, "The extremely large size of such carcinoma leads to a low Max/Avg" [132], indicating that the interpretation of this metric must account for other factors, including the lesion size, which may not be known a priori.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition was referred to as the "S/C ratio" in [198]. The "S/C ratio" was also used in [131,132], but in these studies, it referred to the ratio of the maximum pixel intensity to the average pixel intensity. The SCR has also been defined in [11] as the ratio of the mean pixel intensity within a target region of interest (ROI) to the mean pixel intensity outside the ROI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%