2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave-assisted dehydration of fructose and inulin to HMF catalyzed by niobium and zirconium phosphate catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
110
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
6
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be attributed to the production of large quantities of soluble polymers and/or humins catalyzed by excessive amounts of surface acid sites . Another proposed reason for the decrease of 5‐HMF selectivity and yield could be that 5‐HMF formed in fructose dehydration was then partially converted into levulinic and formic acid by‐products, which was in good agreement with the previous report . In addition, the oligomerization, self‐polymerization, cross‐polymerization etc of produced 5‐HMF with other by‐products could also ultimately result in the decline of 5‐HMF selectivity and yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be attributed to the production of large quantities of soluble polymers and/or humins catalyzed by excessive amounts of surface acid sites . Another proposed reason for the decrease of 5‐HMF selectivity and yield could be that 5‐HMF formed in fructose dehydration was then partially converted into levulinic and formic acid by‐products, which was in good agreement with the previous report . In addition, the oligomerization, self‐polymerization, cross‐polymerization etc of produced 5‐HMF with other by‐products could also ultimately result in the decline of 5‐HMF selectivity and yield.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Alternatively, heterogeneous catalysts such as solid acids are becoming more and more attractive due to their stronger acidity and easier regeneration as well as less corrosivity, which accelerate their wide application in production of 5‐HMF from fructose ,,. Currently, various types of solid acid catalysts have been designed for the preparation of 5‐HMF, such as heteropoly acids, tungstated zirconias, cerium phosphates, zirconium phosphates, niobium phosphates, zirconium hydrogen phosphates, carbon catalysts etc. Among these various candidates, carbonaceous solid acids have attracted considerable attentions as efficient catalysts because of their relatively strong Brönsted acidity of oxygen‐ and sulfur‐containing functional groups together with the green, convenient and stable natures .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , full conversion of fructose was achieved over the three catalysts, however, the highest HMF yield of 56.3% for ZrP (P/Zr = 2) was observed just because of its strongest L acidity (Figure ) and B acidity (Table ) compared to those of the other ZrP. Moreover, this result shows advantages than some reported works (Table ), which involved with microwave assistant or sub‐critical water with critical reaction conditions, as well as a lower fructose conversion (52.8%) . For example, the difference can be explained by the fact that ZrP (P/Zr = 2) had larger surface area and more acidic sites, which promotes the dehydration of fructose .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…After three times of recycle experiments, the fresh catalyst changed from white to light brown in color after using, and the yield of EL decreased slightly from 97.8% to 91.3%. Therefore, the EDS and FTIR analyses were used to characterize the used catalyst (see Supporting Information), which found that organic deposits in the catalyst surface and a small loss of P element ,. After calcination, the organic deposition was removed, and the catalytic activity of used catalyst got partial recovery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antonetti et al. obtained a high yield in the biomass direct alcoholysis of fructose to 5‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐furaldehyde by using ZPs . Jain et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%