2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave effect in the dehydrogenation of tetralin and decalin with a fixed-bed reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result infers that acid hydrolysis involves an initial interaction of cellulose with the AC-SO 3 H catalyst surface followed by proton attack of the cellulose framework from loss of proton by catalyst (-H + ) to initiate the depolymerization process (see below). Germane to the present study, Suttisawat and coworkers [18] established that the dehydrogenation reaction of decalin to tetralin in the presence of microwave selectively heated Pd/AC catalyst particulates accelerated the adsorption/desorption rates of decalin on the catalyst's surface, a result of differences between the temperature at the catalyst surface and the temperature of the solution. In the present case, the interaction of cellulose with the AC-SO 3 H catalyst surface is also impacted by the selective heating conditions.…”
Section: Other Characteristics Of the Microwave Heating Methods Comparsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This result infers that acid hydrolysis involves an initial interaction of cellulose with the AC-SO 3 H catalyst surface followed by proton attack of the cellulose framework from loss of proton by catalyst (-H + ) to initiate the depolymerization process (see below). Germane to the present study, Suttisawat and coworkers [18] established that the dehydrogenation reaction of decalin to tetralin in the presence of microwave selectively heated Pd/AC catalyst particulates accelerated the adsorption/desorption rates of decalin on the catalyst's surface, a result of differences between the temperature at the catalyst surface and the temperature of the solution. In the present case, the interaction of cellulose with the AC-SO 3 H catalyst surface is also impacted by the selective heating conditions.…”
Section: Other Characteristics Of the Microwave Heating Methods Comparsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…154 As an example, MW effects in heterogeneous catalysis were investigated in the dehydrogenation reaction of decalin and tetralin. 155,156 The use of MW heating proved both to improve the reagent conversion and to lower the deactivation rate of the catalyst. An observed beneficial effect of MW use was the large temperature gradient between the catalyst and surrounding species (direction of heat transfer reversed compared with the thermal mode).…”
Section: Microwave-assisted Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coke deposited on the catalyst after upgrading reaction is as follows: 21.7% (N 2 gas only), 17.3% (tetralin), 13.4% (decalin) and 14.2% (H 2 gas only). Thermodynamically, the liberation of hydrogen from polycyclic organic compounds such as tetralin and decalin is favored at high temperatures, such as 425 • C [17,31]. In the case of tetralin, the complete dehydrogenation of a mole produces naphthalene and only two moles of hydrogen; hence, the reaction medium could have experienced limited hydrogen supply to adequately quench radical fragments of macromolecular weight hydrocarbons [32,33].…”
Section: Hydrogen Donor Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with the observation of Abu-Laban et al [18], for a comparative study of deoxygenation of pyrolysis oil using induction heating of pelleted Pt/Al 2 O 3 catalyst mixed with steel balls and conventional heating with heating cable. Unlike conventional heating in which heat flow into the catalyst from the surrounding fluid, for induction heating, the rapid heat up of catalyst and surrounding fluids by the steel balls causes heat to flow outwardly from the catalyst surface, promoting desorption of molecules, and thus deterring the polymerization and condensation reactions responsible for coke formation [18,31]. The reason for this is that the surface of the catalyst is hotter than the surrounding fluid [17].…”
Section: Coke Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%