1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1098(1997)8:4<337::aid-ima1>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave imaging: Reconstructions from experimental data using conjugate gradient and enhancement by edge-preserving regularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, • stands for the regularization parameter, and 4( ) is a function of the gradient of the reconstructed image and is called the edge-preserving regularization function. Many researchers have proposed a variety of functions to be f( ) [Herbert and Leahy, 1989;Lange, 1990] and derived satisfying results for inverse problems [Bouman and Sauer, 1993;Delaney and Breslet, 1998], including the inverse scattering problem itself [Lobel et al, 1997].…”
Section: Edge-preserving Regularized Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, • stands for the regularization parameter, and 4( ) is a function of the gradient of the reconstructed image and is called the edge-preserving regularization function. Many researchers have proposed a variety of functions to be f( ) [Herbert and Leahy, 1989;Lange, 1990] and derived satisfying results for inverse problems [Bouman and Sauer, 1993;Delaney and Breslet, 1998], including the inverse scattering problem itself [Lobel et al, 1997].…”
Section: Edge-preserving Regularized Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches exist for solving this ill-posed nonlinear inverse problem [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In [1], edge preserving regularization was imposed on the real and imaginary part of the complex permittivity separately. Multiplicative smoothing (MS) [4] applies Tikhonov regularization in a multiplicative fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjugate gradients is often used in this type of restoration problem [9], [10]. However, conjugate gradients does not exploit the fact that the edges are sparse and the problem is mostly shift-invariant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%