2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave link rainfall estimation: Effects of link length and frequency, temporal sampling, power resolution, and wet antenna attenuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
189
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
189
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of wet antenna attenuation is hence assumed to be constant. Values of coefficients a and b used in this study are those derived from measured drop size distributions (34). Daily link-based rainfall depths are compared with gauge-adjusted radar retrievals to calibrate the rainfall retrieval algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of wet antenna attenuation is hence assumed to be constant. Values of coefficients a and b used in this study are those derived from measured drop size distributions (34). Daily link-based rainfall depths are compared with gauge-adjusted radar retrievals to calibrate the rainfall retrieval algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling strategy is also an important error source, e.g. one sample every 15 min leads to large deviations due to unresolved rainfall variability (Leijnse et al, 2008). This paper is organised as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study employs data gathered by the X-band FM-CW (Frequency Modulated -Continuous Wave) Solid-State Weather Surveillance Radar, SOLIDAR, which was located on top of the Electrical Engineering building of Delft University of Technology (Ligthart and Nieuwkerk, 1990). The data gathered for the purpose of this study were collected over a six year period, from January 1991 until August 1997 (Uijlenhoet et al, 1997).…”
Section: Radar and Gauge Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the ground clutter is therefore identified by creating a static clutter map on a polar grid based on the exceedance of a threshold value for more than 90% of the time for dry events. The selected threshold is 22.3 dBZ, which corresponds to the 1 mm h −1 originally given as the minimum detectable signal level for SOLIDAR (Ligthart and Nieuwkerk, 1990 Fig. 3.…”
Section: Ground Clutter Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%