2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave palaeointensity results from the Matuyama–Brunhes geomagnetic field reversal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it has been shown that geomagnetic excursions are associated with higher MAD values in loess samples [Yang et al, 2007;Spassov et al, 2011] because of the low alignment efficiency of the magnetic particles [Jin and Liu, 2011b]. In the case of unit L9 of the GL loess, we suggest that the normal polarity ChRM isolated by AFD (Figure 8c), corresponding to low values of NRM x /NRM and to high values of MAD AFD (Figure 8d), and which cannot be readily correlated to features such as the Kamikatsura and Santa Rosa excursions of the standard GPTS, may represent two possible conditions: (i) On the one hand, during the course of the Kamikatsura (880-886 ka) [Singer et al, 1999] and Santa Rosa (936 ka) [Singer and Brown, 2002] events, the polarity of the ChRM changes to normal, and because of the weak paleointensity during these two events Gratton et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2009;Leonhardt et al, 2009] there was a relatively low alignment efficiency of the magnetic particles [Jin and Liu, 2011b]. Accordingly, values of NRM x / NRM are reduced and MAD values increased [Yang et al, 2007;Spassov et al, 2011].…”
Section: And €mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been shown that geomagnetic excursions are associated with higher MAD values in loess samples [Yang et al, 2007;Spassov et al, 2011] because of the low alignment efficiency of the magnetic particles [Jin and Liu, 2011b]. In the case of unit L9 of the GL loess, we suggest that the normal polarity ChRM isolated by AFD (Figure 8c), corresponding to low values of NRM x /NRM and to high values of MAD AFD (Figure 8d), and which cannot be readily correlated to features such as the Kamikatsura and Santa Rosa excursions of the standard GPTS, may represent two possible conditions: (i) On the one hand, during the course of the Kamikatsura (880-886 ka) [Singer et al, 1999] and Santa Rosa (936 ka) [Singer and Brown, 2002] events, the polarity of the ChRM changes to normal, and because of the weak paleointensity during these two events Gratton et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2009;Leonhardt et al, 2009] there was a relatively low alignment efficiency of the magnetic particles [Jin and Liu, 2011b]. Accordingly, values of NRM x / NRM are reduced and MAD values increased [Yang et al, 2007;Spassov et al, 2011].…”
Section: And €mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise paleomagnetic data of polarity reversals are crucial for understanding the geomagnetic field and have been expected to constrain geodynamo models in the deep interior of the Earth. Paleointensity studies on volcanic rocks have shown that the geomagnetic field intensity during polarity reversals is quite low, and is 1/10 ∼ 1/3 of the nontransitional field intensity [e.g., Prévot et al , 1985; Quidelleur and Valet , 1996; Valet et al , 1999; Brown et al , 2009]. It is widely accepted that the field intensity drops prior to major directional changes and recovers after them [e.g., Merrill and McFadden , 1999; Brown et al , 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleointensity studies on volcanic rocks have shown that the geomagnetic field intensity during polarity reversals is quite low, and is 1/10 ∼ 1/3 of the nontransitional field intensity [e.g., Prévot et al , 1985; Quidelleur and Valet , 1996; Valet et al , 1999; Brown et al , 2009]. It is widely accepted that the field intensity drops prior to major directional changes and recovers after them [e.g., Merrill and McFadden , 1999; Brown et al , 2009]. In other words, the decrease of the geocentric axial dipole (GAD) occurs at the onset of polarity reversals, suggesting that the GAD intensity change is vital for the geodynamo at the onset of polarity reversals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[] (hereafter referred to as C00), Carlut and Quidelleur [] (hereafter referred to as CQ00), and Brown et al . [] (hereafter referred to as B09). Based upon K‐Ar Cassignol‐Gillot ages [ Samper et al ., ], the island can be split into five broad volcanic complexes (Figure b): the Basal complex (2.79–2.69 Ma); Septentrional Chain (1.8–1.15 Ma); Axial Chain (1.02–0.44 Ma); Monts Caraïbes Massif (0.56–0.45 Ma); and Grande Découverte volcanic complex (0.20 Ma—present).…”
Section: Sampling Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%