DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036541121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave remote sensing for soil moisture monitoring: synergy of active and passive observations and validation of retrieved products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent and comprehensive reviews on the application of optical and thermal remote sensing for SM estimation emphasize the importance of these methods in addressing the limitations of low-resolution large-scale remote sensing products [41]. This approach provides a unique opportunity for the direct observation of soil moisture, making it an essential method for monitoring soil moisture over large areas [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent and comprehensive reviews on the application of optical and thermal remote sensing for SM estimation emphasize the importance of these methods in addressing the limitations of low-resolution large-scale remote sensing products [41]. This approach provides a unique opportunity for the direct observation of soil moisture, making it an essential method for monitoring soil moisture over large areas [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil moisture and evapotranspiration are inversely related to LST. Dente (2016) and Mohanty et al (2017) have shown that soil moisture is sensitive to LST and leaf area index (LAI). Saha et al (2019), using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), obtained equations for calculating the minimum and maximum LSTs for one of the Indian basins and used them to calculate the SMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SAR technology, the radar signal follows a logarithmic function with the soil surface roughness. The radar signal and roughness parameter have more strong relationship in the L-band (0.5-1.5 GHz) followed by the C-band (4-8 GHz) and lowest in X-band (8-12 GHz) and are more sensitive to soil roughness at high incidence angles (Zribi and Dechambre 2002;Baghdadi et al 2012;Hosseini et al 2015;Dente 2016;Liu 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%