2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave synthesis of metal-organic frameworks absorbents (DUT-5-2) for the removal of PFOS and PFOA from aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3†), the surface BET area and pore volume were calculated (1616 m 2 g −1 and 0.55 cm 3 g −1 ), consistent with the reported data. 30,34 The thermal stability was confirmed using TGA analysis (Fig. S4†), showing strength up to 430 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S3†), the surface BET area and pore volume were calculated (1616 m 2 g −1 and 0.55 cm 3 g −1 ), consistent with the reported data. 30,34 The thermal stability was confirmed using TGA analysis (Fig. S4†), showing strength up to 430 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This might be explined by the more significant role of hydrophobic interactions in the adsorption of PFOS under high concentrations due to the longer hydrophobic tail of PFOS than PFHxS and PFBS. [35] The adsorption capacity of PFOS on PCN-224 (1.79 mmol g À 1 ) is comparable to that of mesoporous MOF-808 (1.74 mmol g À 1 ), [36] DUT-5-2 (1.89 mmol g À 1 ), [37] and higher than those reported for other MOF materials, including Zr-MOFs, such as NU-1000 (1.16 mmol g À 1 ), [29] UiO-67 (1.08 mmol g À 1 ); [38] ZIFs such as, ZIF-67 (1.37 mmol g À 1 ); [39] and MIL series, such as MIL-53-AL-BPDC (0.57 mmol g À 1 ) [40] (Figure 5d, Table S3). In addition, we performed the adsorption experiment in a 1 ppb solution to investigate the sorption capability of PCN-224 toward PFOS at environmentally relevant concentration.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Pfos Pfhxs and Pfbs On Pcn-224mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The PFOS concentrations in the three rivers used as drinking water sources, including the Tama River, ranged from 13.0 to 38.5 ng/L (Ara River), 0.7 to 157.0 ng/L (Tama River), and 0.9 to 27.3 ng/L (Yodogawa River), respectively. In recent years, with the deepening of research on PFOS and PFOA, people have gradually realized that they are not only accumulating in living organisms, triggering biotoxicity and having a highly negative impact on the organism's liver, immunity and, above all, fertility, but are also potentially carcinogenic [19]. Hence, numerous countermeasures are already being implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%