2017
DOI: 10.1017/pab.2017.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwear–mesowear congruence and mortality bias in rhinoceros mass-death assemblages

Abstract: Although we do not know the cause of death of most fossil animals, mortality is often associated with ecological stress due to seasonality and other stochastic events (droughts, storms, volcanism) that may have caused shifts in feeding ecology preceding death. In these instances, dental microwear, which reflects feeding ecology in a narrow window of time, may provide a biased view of diet. Mesowear, another dental-wear proxy based on the morphology of worn cusps, requires macroscopic amounts of dental wear and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(206 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results may indicate the population was able to sustain itself and there was survival of older individuals. Taphonomic studies of individual deaths in the level of the species or population are a useful tool to better understand the ecology of the area, what the population demographics mean, why the species were there, and what eventually led to their death (Lyman, 1994;Rogers et al, 2007;Mihlbachler et al, 2018). Mihlbachler et al (2018) recently examined microwear and mesowear in mass death assemblages demonstrating how ecological stress can be documented in dental morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results may indicate the population was able to sustain itself and there was survival of older individuals. Taphonomic studies of individual deaths in the level of the species or population are a useful tool to better understand the ecology of the area, what the population demographics mean, why the species were there, and what eventually led to their death (Lyman, 1994;Rogers et al, 2007;Mihlbachler et al, 2018). Mihlbachler et al (2018) recently examined microwear and mesowear in mass death assemblages demonstrating how ecological stress can be documented in dental morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taphonomic studies of individual deaths in the level of the species or population are a useful tool to better understand the ecology of the area, what the population demographics mean, why the species were there, and what eventually led to their death (Lyman, 1994;Rogers et al, 2007;Mihlbachler et al, 2018). Mihlbachler et al (2018) recently examined microwear and mesowear in mass death assemblages demonstrating how ecological stress can be documented in dental morphology. A taphonomic examination of the Gray Fossil Site suggests the tapir specimens built up from attrition, rather than a die-off event leading to mass mortality (Hulbert et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScoreA points toward a more abrasive diet than ScoreB and Ruler, but still coherent with browsing or mixed-feeding (Figure 8). Previous studies reported mesowear scores for extant rhinoceroses using different approaches (Fortelius and Solounias, 2000;Taylor et al, 2013;Mihlbachler et al, 2018;Rivals et al, 2020). The mean values reported by Rivals et al (2020) for extant rhinos using Ruler are under 0.5 for all extant species but C. simum (4.67).…”
Section: Dietary Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Contrary a recent study based on the dental microwear texture analysis reported a greater diversity of feeding behaviours (from browser to grazer) for the large bush-antlered deer E. ctenoides, suggesting a significant dietary plasticity for this early Pleistocene cervid (Berlioz et al, 2017). Dental microwear however records information about the last few meals (hours and days) of an animal before its death (whereas dental mesowear reflects dietary preferences over a longer period; weeks and months) (Sánchez-Hernández et al, 2016;Mihlbachler et al 2018), thus the observed discrepancy could reflect seasonal differences. A more abrasive diet is also recorded for the Olivola…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%