1993
DOI: 10.1016/0892-0362(93)90058-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-frequency hearing loss and reduction of acoustic startle responding in rats following trichloroethylene exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 3 and 4, no signs of synergistic or additive interactions were found in the 90-day subchronic exposures to 100 ppm, 200 ppm, and 500 ppm toluene. This supports the fi ndings from other studies on toluene ototoxicity in rats, where hearing impairment occurred when a certain threshold of toluene exposure was exceeded [4,7,15,23,29,31]. However, contrary to what may have been expected, the exposure to 500 ppm toluene and noise was followed by the same changes in hearing thresholds and CDP loss as the exposure to noise only, while exposure to 100 ppm and 200 ppm toluene and noise was followed by a slightly lower decrease in auditory sensitivity than the exposure to noise alone.…”
Section: Statisticssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figures 3 and 4, no signs of synergistic or additive interactions were found in the 90-day subchronic exposures to 100 ppm, 200 ppm, and 500 ppm toluene. This supports the fi ndings from other studies on toluene ototoxicity in rats, where hearing impairment occurred when a certain threshold of toluene exposure was exceeded [4,7,15,23,29,31]. However, contrary to what may have been expected, the exposure to 500 ppm toluene and noise was followed by the same changes in hearing thresholds and CDP loss as the exposure to noise only, while exposure to 100 ppm and 200 ppm toluene and noise was followed by a slightly lower decrease in auditory sensitivity than the exposure to noise alone.…”
Section: Statisticssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The possible ototoxic effect of toluene was fi rst reported in rats by Pryor et al [1], and subsequent studies demonstrated hearing loss in rats after exposure to toluene [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], styrene [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18], xylene [8,9,12], ethyl benzene [19,20], trichloroethylene [8,9,[21][22][23][24], chlorobenzene [9], and n-heptane [25]. The ototoxic potency of the different solvents varies signifi cantly [9,14,26], but when rats were exposed to different combinations of organic solvents, the auditory impairment was additive with respect to the potency of the solvents under study [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By adapting the technique using the eye-blink response rather than the whole-body startle response, the technique can also be applied in human studies (45). Reflex audiometry has been applied to evaluating the ototoxic properties of a number of drugs and chemicals including ototoxic antibiotics (46), trimethyltin (47), and trichloroethylene (48). One of the disadvantages of reflex audiometry is the relatively long testing sessions that are required to obtain a full audiometric function across a wide range of frequencies.…”
Section: Evaluating Sensory Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%