2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Pliocene shorelines of the US Atlantic Coastal Plain — An improved elevation database with comparison to Earth model predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior occurs in addition to dynamic topography effects and can overprint it, although the growth and decay of ice sheets and their deformational timescales are significantly shorter. A mid-Pliocene (3.1 ± 0.2 Ma) shoreline, known as the Orangeburg Scarp, can be traced from Virginia down to south Georgia at elevations of 40-80 m above present-day sea-level [Rovere et al, 2015]. Eocene and Miocene paleoshorelines along the New Jersey coastal plain have been compared to global sea-level curves and record 50-200 m of anomalous post-Eocene subsidence [Spasojević et al, 2008].…”
Section: D1 Eastern North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior occurs in addition to dynamic topography effects and can overprint it, although the growth and decay of ice sheets and their deformational timescales are significantly shorter. A mid-Pliocene (3.1 ± 0.2 Ma) shoreline, known as the Orangeburg Scarp, can be traced from Virginia down to south Georgia at elevations of 40-80 m above present-day sea-level [Rovere et al, 2015]. Eocene and Miocene paleoshorelines along the New Jersey coastal plain have been compared to global sea-level curves and record 50-200 m of anomalous post-Eocene subsidence [Spasojević et al, 2008].…”
Section: D1 Eastern North Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compiled 1,410 previously published delineations of relict shoreline features (RSF) across the southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain (Figures and S1–S6; Daniels & Kane, ; Lane, ; Rovere et al, [digital format]; Winker & Howard, , ) and digitized them in ArcMAP (version 10.5.1) using the georeferencing menu and adding control points to hard copy maps and the reference layer. For each SSURGO MU and each B′h observation we calculated the distance to the nearest RSF delineation with the Near tool in ArcMAP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here we consider a model of global dynamic topography, discussed below, that provides a good reconciliation with regional geologic observations across the globe (e.g. Austermann & Mitrovica, ; Forte et al, ; Moucha & Forte, ; Moucha & Ruetenik, ; Rowley et al, ; Rovere et al, ; Walker et al, ). Dynamic topography models in ocean basins are not very well constrained, due to the sparse seismic resolution of the upper mantle in the underlying tomography models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%